Re: [Mailman-Users] starting Mailman 2.1a2

2001-07-16 Thread Carson Gaspar
--On Sunday, July 15, 2001 1:07 PM -0600 "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Generally, you create a script under /etc/init.d called 'mailman' and > you soft link it to the run level: > > ln -sf /etc/init.d/mailman /etc/rc2.d/S99mailman (for startup) > ln -sf /etc/init.d

Re: [Mailman-Users] starting Mailman 2.1a2

2001-07-15 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
"J.D. Bronson" wrote: > I find it easier to just put them in /etc/rc2.d However, when having then run from different runlevels, it's better to have one file (under /etc/init.d) with symlinks to whichever runlevel you need it to run from. > I included the path statements...hmmm. I know it i

Re: [Mailman-Users] starting Mailman 2.1a2

2001-07-15 Thread J.D. Bronson
I did this (sort of..) I dont symlink the startup files under solaris. I find it easier to just put them in /etc/rc2.d I included the path statements...hmmm. I know it is built fine, as I said - it will launch MANUALLYjust not at boot up. Thats the part that I dont understand! With nothing

Re: [Mailman-Users] starting Mailman 2.1a2

2001-07-15 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
"J.D. Bronson" wrote: > I wrote a simple script for Solaris to start mailmain under > /etc/rc2.d/S99mailman Generally, you create a script under /etc/init.d called 'mailman' and you soft link it to the run level: ln -sf /etc/init.d/mailman /etc/rc2.d/S99mailman (for startup) ln -sf /et

[Mailman-Users] starting Mailman 2.1a2

2001-07-15 Thread J.D. Bronson
I wrote a simple script for Solaris to start mailmain under /etc/rc2.d/S99mailman Simply put: (snip) case "$1" in start) echo "Starting Mailman" /usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl start ;; (snip) It works 100% if I launch it manually, yet if put in /etc/rc2.d it wil