On 18 Jun 2008, at 17:49, Brad Knowles wrote:
[...]
It is not necessary to recommend to others that they disable this
feature on their copy of postfix. Instead, you should be
recommending to them exactly what I recommended to you, which was to
run a second copy of postfix with all checks
Allan Odgaard wrote:
On 17 Jun 2008, at 18:53, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Brad Knowles wrote:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of
these
has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
delivery to <> failed with code
Allan Odgaard wrote:
If others should run into this problem `reject_unknown_recipient_domain`
was the setting I had to disable in Postfix’s
`smtpd_recipient_restrictions`.
We run postfix on python.org. This option is not disabled on our machine,
because we have a separate copy of postfix li
* Allan Odgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2008, at 18:53, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Brad Knowles wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>>>
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen
of these
has left errors like the following in `logs/smt
On 17 Jun 2008, at 18:53, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Brad Knowles wrote:
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen
of these
has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
delivery to <> failed with code 450:
4.1.2 <>: Rec
Brad Knowles wrote:
>On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>
>> I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of these
>> has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
>>
>> delivery to <> failed with code 450:
>> 4.1.2 <>: Recipient address rejected:
>>
Stefan Förster wrote:
Not 100% related: What happens if my MTA does DNS validation and
rejects addresses who yield an NXDOMAIN (as opposed to a SERVFAIL)
with a permanent error code instead of creating a bounce?
You should turn off the DNS validation in the first place.
That said, I think Mai
* Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>
>> I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of these
>> has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
>>
>>delivery to «address» failed with code 450:
>>4.1.2 «address»: R
On 6/17/08, Allan Odgaard wrote:
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of these
has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
delivery to «address» failed with code 450:
4.1.2 «address»: Recipient address rejected:
Domain not found
You'r
I transferred a lot of list members from a previous list. A dozen of
these has left errors like the following in `logs/smtp-failures`:
delivery to «address» failed with code 450:
4.1.2 «address»: Recipient address rejected:
Domain not found
This is interpreted as a temporary failur
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:31:27 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >> Why are there 121
> >> messages being retried. What is in Mailman's smtp-failure log?
> >
> > It is full of errors:
> >
> >Jan 08 01:55:00 2008 (13316) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
> >(450, '4.1.2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Re
Grigory Batalov wrote:
>
>On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:59:10 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>
>> Why are there 121
>> messages being retried. What is in Mailman's smtp-failure log?
>
> It is full of errors:
>
>Jan 08 01:55:00 2008 (13316) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
>(450, '4.1.2 <[EMAIL
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:41:23 +0300, Grigory Batalov wrote:
> > What does Mailman's smtp log look like? Does it show evidence of
> > 'continuous processing'?
>
> Well, there are messages like this:
>
> Jan 08 01:55:11 2008 (12250) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp to sisyphus for 1
> recips, completed i
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:59:10 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >I have regular delays in message processing. Say, my server (Linux/Postfix)
> >receives a letter at 17:36 and quickly delivers it to the mailman queue (?).
> >Then message is hold for about 25 minutes and is processed again at 18:01.
> >
> >
Grigory Batalov wrote:
>
>I have regular delays in message processing. Say, my server (Linux/Postfix)
>receives a letter at 17:36 and quickly delivers it to the mailman queue (?).
>Then message is hold for about 25 minutes and is processed again at 18:01.
>
>It is strange to me, why mailman keeps t
Hello!
I have regular delays in message processing. Say, my server (Linux/Postfix)
receives a letter at 17:36 and quickly delivers it to the mailman queue (?).
Then message is hold for about 25 minutes and is processed again at 18:01.
It is strange to me, why mailman keeps the message so long?
Ho
Young, Darren wrote:
>
>Any thoughts on what could be wrong with these? That partition is at 8%,
>there are no physical errors reported on the system (at least in syslog)
>and I don't see any _obvious_ errors regarding those files in the
>Mailman logs. Permission issue perhaps?
>
>The files that ar
> >- Why would files as .pck.tmp be "stuck" in the out
> directory? Same for
> >the in directory.
>
> The enqueue() method (see Mailman/Queue/Switchboard.py) first
> creates the queue file with a .tmp extension and then after
> writing the message object and metadata renames it to remove
> t
Young, Darren wrote:
>Few questions for any experts on the qfiles directories..
>
>Is there a detailed description anywhere on the qfiles sub-direcotries?
>If not...
There is some overview im Mailman/Queue/IncomingRunner.py, but probably
much less than you're looking for.
>- What are the files
Few questions for any experts on the qfiles directories..
Is there a detailed description anywhere on the qfiles sub-direcotries?
If not...
- What are the files in the qfiles/virgin directory?
- Why would files as .pck.tmp be "stuck" in the out directory? Same for
the in directory.
- What condi
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:53:19PM +0200, Franz Georg Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:12:49PM +0100, Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > At 15:35 12/08/2002 +0200, Franz Georg =?iso-8859-15?Q?K=F6hler?= wrote:
> >>All of the sudden, Mailman V. 2.0.11 sto
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:12:49PM +0100, Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 15:35 12/08/2002 +0200, Franz Georg =?iso-8859-15?Q?K=F6hler?= wrote:
>>All of the sudden, Mailman V. 2.0.11 stopped working, I'm getting those
>>messages in the log file:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>Mailman successfull
At 15:35 12/08/2002 +0200, Franz Georg =?iso-8859-15?Q?K=F6hler?= wrote:
>All of the sudden, Mailman V. 2.0.11 stopped working, I'm getting those
>messages in the log file:
>
>
>Aug 12 15:17:03 2002 qrunner(453): Traceback (innermost last):
>Aug 12 15:17:03 2002 qrunner(453): File "/usr/lib/mail
All of the sudden, Mailman V. 2.0.11 stopped working, I'm getting those
messages in the log file:
Aug 12 15:17:03 2002 qrunner(453): Traceback (innermost last):
Aug 12 15:17:03 2002 qrunner(453): File "/usr/lib/mailman/cron/qrunner", line 283,
in ?
Aug 12 15:17:03 2002 qrunner(453): kids
hey
belong, then something is acting as a bottle neck!
Jon Carnes
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Sammons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] queue...
>
> Sorry but what can i do if
Sorry but what can i do if the mailqueue in sendmail
is full..i mean procedures, etc
Thanks.
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Encuentra el coche de tus sueños en Yahoo! Autos http://autos.yahoo.com.mx
---
26 matches
Mail list logo
