On 4/17/2005 11:57, "David Relson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using the date in the "From " line would have done what I want. I'd be
> happy with an option to enable that behavior. As that line is known as
> the "envelope", perhaps option "--envelope-date" or "--envelope" would
> be appropriat
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:08:28 -0700
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
> >
> >Unfortunately, I don't know the full history of mylist.mbox. I don't
> >recall mucking with the mbox file and May 2004 was quite a while ago
> >and there's no telling. I don't _think_ I did anything with the mbox
David Relson wrote:
>
>Unfortunately, I don't know the full history of mylist.mbox. I don't
>recall mucking with the mbox file and May 2004 was quite a while ago
>and there's no telling. I don't _think_ I did anything with the mbox
>file -- especially since I use the .mbx extension and don't reca
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:57:33 -0700
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
> >
> >On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:46:06 -0700
> >Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >
> >> If you built your archive initially by creating a
> >> mylist.mbox/mylist.mbox file with your imported archives and then
> >> running bin/arch. Then
David Relson wrote:
>
>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:46:06 -0700
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> If you built your archive initially by creating a
>> mylist.mbox/mylist.mbox file with your imported archives and then
>> running bin/arch. Then the archiver would continue to append new
>> messages to mylist.mbox/my
Hello Mark,
First, sorry about the 2 null replies. Somehow, letter "y" got mapped
to "send message" which makes writing a message really tough.
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:46:06 -0700
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
> >
> >I think I've encountered a gotcha with mm.arch.
>
> I'm confused. d
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:46:06 -0700
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
> >
> >I think I've encountered a gotcha with mm.arch.
>
> I'm confused. do you mean bin/arch or are you talking about some older
> Mailman that I don't know about?
M
>
> >In May 2004 I brought up mailman with list arch
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:46:06 -0700
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Relson wrote:
> >
> >I think I've encountered a gotcha with mm.arch.
>
> I'm confused. do you mean bin/arch or are you talking about some older
> Mailman that I don't know about?
>
> >In May 2004 I brought up mailman with list archi
David Relson wrote:
>
>I think I've encountered a gotcha with mm.arch.
I'm confused. do you mean bin/arch or are you talking about some older
Mailman that I don't know about?
>In May 2004 I brought up mailman with list archives (from another
>program). All went well, AFAICT. A few days ago the
Greetings,
I think I've encountered a gotcha with mm.arch.
In May 2004 I brought up mailman with list archives (from another
program). All went well, AFAICT. A few days ago the listserver's
hard drive crashed and I rebuilt the list archives from the monthly
mbox files. I was very surprised to
10 matches
Mail list logo
