Melinda Gilmore wrote:
>So there is not a nocol type way to have yourself paged for mailman itself.
I know nothing about nocol, but it seems unlikely that the only way it
can check on the health of a process is via communication to a socket,
but even if that is the case, you could create your o
Melinda Gilmore wrote:
>I looked somewhat in the archives but am not finding information on what
>port mailmanctl listens on. Or this whole email may show my ignorance on
>the setup. But what I am trying to do is setup a warning in our nocol if
>mailmanctl is down. I need a port number.
mailm
I looked somewhat in the archives but am not finding information on what
port mailmanctl listens on. Or this whole email may show my ignorance on
the setup. But what I am trying to do is setup a warning in our nocol if
mailmanctl is down. I need a port number.
Thanks
--
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the ports used by mailman in tcp/ip traffic should be 25 and 110 (smtp + pop).
> Are there any other ports used in connection with mailman ?
Mailman doesn't use POP. You'll need to have port 80 open if you expect
people ot use the web interface thou
Hi, all.
This may sound stupid:
the ports used by mailman in tcp/ip traffic should be 25 and 110 (smtp + pop).
Are there any other ports used in connection with mailman ?
We intend to use mailman in a secure intranet,
where only the absolutely necessary ports will be active.
So far, it runs per
