At 4:22 PM +0100 2006-06-05, David Lee wrote:
> Yes it is that "sometimes" which is baffling. An email to the list failed
> (as described, with that set of symptoms) this morning. A repost
> (admittedly slightly edited) to appease those who would complain of
> double receipt worked (all sym
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Is there anything in Mailman's error log? Anything in the 'shunt' queue
> (qfiles/shunt directory)?
Empty for two weeks (and that itself was installation set-up issues).
> >> >3. Instead of:
> >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Sender: [EMAIL P
David Lee wrote:
>smtp: All cases:
> <...> smtp to ourlist for 89 recips, completed in ...
>
>smtp-failure: Nothing
>
>bounce: No error indications.
>
>"bounce processing" webpage indicates "Yes" for all the yes/no tickboxes.
OK. This tells us that Mailman delivered the post to sendmail f
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Lee wrote:
> >
> >System:
> > Fedora Core 5
> > Mailman 2.1.8 (RPM: mailman-2.1.8-0.FC5.1)
> > sendmail 8.13.6 (RPM: sendmail-8.13.6-0.FC5.1)
> >
> >
> >On the test list for our staff (89 members), some of the emails are
> >failing, while others
David Lee wrote:
>
>System:
> Fedora Core 5
> Mailman 2.1.8 (RPM: mailman-2.1.8-0.FC5.1)
> sendmail 8.13.6 (RPM: sendmail-8.13.6-0.FC5.1)
>
>
>On the test list for our staff (89 members), some of the emails are
>failing, while others succeed. On a failure email:
>1. it only reaches 59 (out o
We're new to mailman, which we are testing on our own departmental staff
list prior to wider roll-out at the univeristy.
System:
Fedora Core 5
Mailman 2.1.8 (RPM: mailman-2.1.8-0.FC5.1)
sendmail 8.13.6 (RPM: sendmail-8.13.6-0.FC5.1)
On the test list for our staff (89 members), some of t
