Re: [Mailman-Users] obscure addresses in archive

2006-02-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I expect at the moment this involves some mess making a second > copy of the archive with the email addresses removed?? >I notice mailman-users has a separate mailing list archive with > email addresses hidden... How does that work? I assume you are thinking of the m

Re: [Mailman-Users] obscure addresses in archive

2006-02-20 Thread enyc
Dave Stern wrote: > I could zero or edit the existing archive wiping addresses > and leaving the archive public but wonder if there is some > way for future submissions to have their addresses masked. > They're looking for complete anonymity, not just a change > to user_at_host_fqdn. (as per next

Re: [Mailman-Users] obscure addresses in archive

2006-02-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dave Stern wrote: > >I could zero or edit the existing archive wiping addresses and leaving >the archive public but wonder if there is some way for future submissions >to have their addresses masked. They're looking for complete anonymity, >not just a change to user_at_host_fqdn. > >Can this be don

[Mailman-Users] obscure addresses in archive

2006-02-20 Thread Dave Stern
When one of our lists was first set up, users were subscribed but not sent their password (and monthly passwd is turned off also). Because of this, they couldn't get into the private archive. So the listadmin made the list archive public. Now users are complaining about spammers harvesting thei