on 1/26/09 4:03 PM, Barry Finkel said:
We had a case last week when someone sent mail with a spoofed
"From: "
line that contained the e-mail address of the list owner. The mail
was delivered to us via a SMTP mailer of an ISP, and we have in the
mail headers the IP address of the send
On 01/26/09 15:55, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
This kind of defeats the purpose, by definition, of a non-moderated,
subscribers-only list. This would be the equivalent of setting
everyone's mod flag on, at which point it becomes a moderated list.
Either you allow subscribers to post, or you don't,
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 16:03 -0600, Barry Finkel wrote:
> We had a case last week when someone sent mail with a spoofed
>
> "From: "
>
> line that contained the e-mail address of the list owner.
Unless the list owner is also a subscriber with his/her mod flag turned
off, the fact that so
Steve Lindemann wrote:
>Had something strange occur early Saturday morning. A non-subscriber
>managed to successfully post to two member only lists (and, of course,
>it was spam).
>
>The bogus sender (thelevisstoreonl...@levis.rsys1.com) is not a member
>of these member only lists and is not i
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 15:44 -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/26/09 15:26, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> > All the headers of the spam post. In a default installation, if any
> > of From:, Reply-To: or Sender: headers or the envelope sender as
> > reflected in the Unix From or Return-Path: header contain
On 01/26/09 15:26, Mark Sapiro wrote:
All the headers of the spam post. In a default installation, if any
of From:, Reply-To: or Sender: headers or the envelope sender as
reflected in the Unix From or Return-Path: header contains a member
address, the post will be deemed from that member.
Can
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 13:26 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If that isn't the answer, then it is possible that, as Lindsay
> suggests, the post contained an Approved: header with the list admin
> or moderator password.
Mark's answer is probably more likely than mine. I was in the process
of reading M
Steve Lindemann wrote:
>Had something strange occur early Saturday morning. A non-subscriber
>managed to successfully post to two member only lists (and, of course,
>it was spam).
>
>The bogus sender (thelevisstoreonl...@levis.rsys1.com) is not a member
>of these member only lists and is not i