subject:"\[Mailman\-Users\] mm\-handler v3"

Re: [Mailman-Users] mm-handler v3

2018-11-28 Thread Mark Sapiro

On 11/28/18 1:39 PM, Jim Ziobro wrote: > > As I was working on this I came to understand more about how Mailman > works. I now realize that mm-handler would not be necessary if Mailman > fully connected to Sendmail. The Postfix connection looks very close. > I'll take a crack at it. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] mm-handler v3

2018-11-28 Thread Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users

On 11/28/2018 02:39 PM, Jim Ziobro wrote: I now realize that mm-handler would not be necessary if Mailman fully connected to Sendmail. The Postfix connection looks very close. Please elaborate on what you mean by "if Mailman fully connected to Sendmail". Rather, how is Mailman not already co

[Mailman-Users] mm-handler v3

2018-11-28 Thread Jim Ziobro

I started with the 2008 version of mm-handler. My original goal was to fix a couple of bugs: lower case conversion and forwarding mail to POSTMASTER. But I rewrote it to remove stuff which will never get executed and remove other things which might cause future bugs. mm-handler went from 300