Re: [Mailman-Users] mm-handler setup, new domain

2006-11-29 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:06 AM -0500 11/30/06, David Abrahams wrote: >> Just make sure you don't try to use a CNAME alias instead of a real IP >> address. The RFCs require that all CNAME aliases get their hostname >> replaced with the actual canonical name that is referenced, and this >> will hose your Mailman c

Re: [Mailman-Users] mm-handler setup, new domain

2006-11-29 Thread David Abrahams
Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 6:10 PM -0500 11/29/06, David Abrahams wrote: > >> So I am inclined to simply point a DNS record for >> lists.boost-consulting.com at the same IP address and go from there. >> Is there any reason that shouldn't work out peachily, and are there >> a

Re: [Mailman-Users] mm-handler setup, new domain

2006-11-29 Thread Brad Knowles
At 6:10 PM -0500 11/29/06, David Abrahams wrote: > So I am inclined to simply point a DNS record for > lists.boost-consulting.com at the same IP address and go from there. > Is there any reason that shouldn't work out peachily, and are there > any pitfalls I need to watch out for? Just make s

[Mailman-Users] mm-handler setup, new domain

2006-11-29 Thread David Abrahams
I am trying to set up Mailman at boost-consulting.com, which uses Sendmail. The README states: mm-handler is only really useful when it mostly "owns" its mail domain So I am inclined to simply point a DNS record for lists.boost-consulting.com at the same IP address and go from there. Is the

[Mailman-Users] mm-handler setup, new domain

2006-11-29 Thread David Abrahams
I am trying to set up Mailman at boost-consulting.com, which uses Sendmail. The README states: mm-handler is only really useful when it mostly "owns" its mail domain So I am inclined to simply point a DNS record for lists.boost-consulting.com at the same IP address and go from there. Is the