[Mailman-Users] "Message discarded" "spamdetect", why?

Hi, yesterday, I member tried multiple times to send a to a list, from a roundcube webmailer which is running on the same host as mailman itself. The message is in plain text without any attachments, no HTML either. Yet it was silently discarded by mailman. In /var/log/mailman/vette I find the mes

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message not removeable

Op 05-06-19 om 17:37 schreef Mark Sapiro: > On 6/4/19 1:41 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> Op 04-06-19 om 22:05 schreef Mark Sapiro: >>> On 6/4/19 3:30 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: In one of the mailinglists came a message what's to big. I've changed max_message_size but it was not p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message not removeable

On 6/4/19 1:41 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 04-06-19 om 22:05 schreef Mark Sapiro: >> On 6/4/19 3:30 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>> >>> In one of the mailinglists came a message what's to big. I've changed >>> max_message_size but it was not possible to send the message. Now I want >>> to re

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message not removeable

Op 04-06-19 om 22:05 schreef Mark Sapiro: > On 6/4/19 3:30 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >> >> In one of the mailinglists came a message what's to big. I've changed >> max_message_size but it was not possible to send the message. Now I want >> to remove the message, but that's also not possible, it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message not removeable

On 6/4/19 3:30 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > > In one of the mailinglists came a message what's to big. I've changed > max_message_size but it was not possible to send the message. Now I want > to remove the message, but that's also not possible, it still is there > and the list-owner gets messag

[Mailman-Users] Message not removeable

Hello, In one of the mailinglists came a message what's to big. I've changed max_message_size but it was not possible to send the message. Now I want to remove the message, but that's also not possible, it still is there and the list-owner gets messages about it. How can I remove this message, or

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required - was: Reply-to options not working

On 2018-02-06 04:09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Do you have something to add to that, or disagree with that? I said it was what *I* believe, not what IETF believes. Dima -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required - was: Reply-to options not working

Dimitri Maziuk writes: > Heh. I personally believe that a message sent by a mailing list > *must* have the mailing list as the originator: dkim, id, and > whatever else. First, please be careful with terminology. *Originator* is well-defined (RFC 5598) as the agent of the Author that first in

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required

Mark Sapiro writes: > On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > > > According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be > > present and MUST be unique. > > Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I > recently looked it up in RFC 5322 and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required - was: Reply-to options not working

On 02/05/2018 11:55 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> >> According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be >> present and MUST be unique. > > Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I > recently looked it up in R

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message-ID required - was: Reply-to options not working

On 02/05/2018 12:22 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > According to RFC, Message-ID is an originator field, and MUST be > present and MUST be unique. Do you have a reference for this? I thought this was correct, but I recently looked it up in RFC 5322 and predecessors (see

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message stuck in held messages queue. Why, how to fix?

Mark Sapiro writes: > On 08/24/2017 08:39 AM, Ian Kelling wrote: >> I mark it as accept then submit, the request returns 200, the page >> reappears and the message is still there. Why? >> >> Things I wonder if they are related: >> * Under the message, it says "The sender is now a member of this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message stuck in held messages queue. Why, how to fix?

On 08/24/2017 08:39 AM, Ian Kelling wrote: > I mark it as accept then submit, the request returns 200, the page > reappears and the message is still there. Why? > > Things I wonder if they are related: > * Under the message, it says "The sender is now a member of this list" > * The post goes over

[Mailman-Users] Message stuck in held messages queue. Why, how to fix?

I mark it as accept then submit, the request returns 200, the page reappears and the message is still there. Why? Things I wonder if they are related: * Under the message, it says "The sender is now a member of this list" * The post goes over http, but the get requests are over https. It's a priv

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message not accepted for policy reasons

Thank you very much for the reply that was exactly what I'm looking for , I just had to upgrade mailman to 2.1.18 to find these options Le 19/07/2017 à 16:45, Mark Sapiro a écrit : On 07/19/2017 06:23 AM, Radwa Hamed wrote: is there a way to change the sender address to our domain which permi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message not accepted for policy reasons

On 07/19/2017 06:23 AM, Radwa Hamed wrote: > > is there a way to change the sender address to our > domain which permits our ip as sender , while keeping the reply to > address that of the original sender , so that the sender would be known > to others See In

[Mailman-Users] Message not accepted for policy reasons

Hello everyone , I have a list with many subscribers with different email addresses , when users send to the list from any domain like yahoo or gmail it is rejected by some servers like yahoo as the domain of sender is yahoo for example while yahoo doesn't allow the ip of our server as permitt

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Held for approval -- too verbose

On 05/10/2017 09:15 PM, Piet Barber via Mailman-Users wrote: > > The problem is when the "This message has been held by a moderator for > approval" messages come to me. > > My Gmail is labeling those as spam. They're labeling them as spam because > Mailman is forwarding the entire message to my

[Mailman-Users] Message Held for approval -- too verbose

Hi. I have a mailing list, and it gets a lot of spam. The spammers have gotten very good at getting through my multiple layers of defense, spam assassin, grey listing, SPF, DKIM, DMARC. I hate the spammers. Of all the difficult things that systems administration handles; it's mail administration

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message waiting for Moderator action

On 01/05/2017 02:05 PM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote: > > I checked the open moderation tasks and found that no message was listed > there. A quick question to the others doing some moderation if I am away > showed that the message was discarded few hours after it has been sent. >

[Mailman-Users] Message waiting for Moderator action

Hi all One of my users asked "how long does it take until you moderators either approve or discard my message?" (the message was held because the size exceeded the limit for the list), and he never saw the message in the list but also did not receive a notification about a rejection. I chec

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 4:32 PM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > > User was reusing an old message that was previously sent to the list, and > then using Outlook's 'Send Again' feature, which caused the message to > contain headers that mailman placed into the original message. When the > IncomingRunner process saw

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

016 11:33 AM To: Hirayama, Pat ; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette On 7/8/16 10:37 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > Hi Mark, > > 3892 is the IncomingRunner process. > > And I'm still running 2.1.9, since that is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 10:37 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > Hi Mark, > > 3892 is the IncomingRunner process. > > And I'm still running 2.1.9, since that is what was provided with CentOS 5.x. > I will have to upgrade that box soon to CentOS 7.x -- which comes with > 2.1.15. Do you have an example message?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 9:55 AM To: Hirayama, Pat ; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette On 7/8/16 9:33 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > > This is the message (from just a few minutes a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 9:33 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > > This is the message (from just a few minutes ago, in fact): > > Jul 08 09:17:51 2016 (3892) Message discarded, msgid: <...> > > I am stumped. The sender is a non-moderated member. She is in fact, listed > as a moderator. filter_content is set to no

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 9:27 AM To: Hirayama, Pat ; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette On 7/8/16 9:00 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > > WRT Content filtering -- if filter_content is set to NO, then n

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/8/16 9:00 AM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > > WRT Content filtering -- if filter_content is set to NO, then nothing else in > that section should apply, right? That is, even if there is stuff defined > for pass_mime_types and filter_filename_extensions? That's correct. Note that what I wrote b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

- From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mailman-users-bounces+phirayam=fredhutch@python.org] On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2016 5:52 PM To: mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette On 7/7/16 3:58 PM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

On 7/7/16 3:58 PM, Hirayama, Pat wrote: > So, I found a 10 year old post where Mark Sapiro described some of the > reasons why "Message discarded" with only a message id and no reason happens: > > Examples are when nothing is left after content filtering, a post from > a moderated user when actio

[Mailman-Users] Message discarded without reason logged in vette

So, I found a 10 year old post where Mark Sapiro described some of the reasons why "Message discarded" with only a message id and no reason happens: Examples are when nothing is left after content filtering, a post from a moderated user when action is discard, a post from a non-member in discard_

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message footers

On 04/17/2016 04:39 AM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote: > Hi all > > The standard message footers for my lists are > > ___ > %(real_name)s mailing list > %(real_name)s@%(host_name)s > %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message footers

On 4/17/2016 6:39 AM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote: Hi all The standard message footers for my lists are ___ %(real_name)s mailing list %(real_name)s@%(host_name)s %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s I would like to add

[Mailman-Users] Message footers

Hi all The standard message footers for my lists are ___ %(real_name)s mailing list %(real_name)s@%(host_name)s %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s I would like to add some information here how to get help and how to unsubscribe.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

Guilty as charged. On several counts. Oy! On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:56:57 +0200, you wrote: >In a message of Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:35:02 -0400, Steve Matzura writes: >>Well now I've seen everything. Why would Mailman send a return message >>to a subscriber to a mailing list that says their message cou

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

On Thursday 01 October 2015, Bryan Blackwell wrote: > Probably just as well to turn them off, most people use the web interface > nowadays and have for some time. Very long time for some of us, almost got kicked off of a mailing list about 15 years ago when I discovered List Serve had added a web

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:10:35 -0400 Bryan Blackwell wrote: Hello Bryan, >When e-mail lists had no web interface, subscribers would often send >admin commands - "unsubscribe", "set digest", etc., to the actual list Sadly, many people still do. Despite the appearance of footer notes telling them w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 1:35 AM, Steve Matzura wrote: > > Well now I've seen everything. Why would Mailman send a return message > to a subscriber to a mailing list that says their message couldn't be > posted to the mailing list because "message may contain > administrivia"? When e-mail lists had

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

On 09/30/2015 11:56 PM, Laura Creighton wrote: > > I am curious -- does mailman 3 have this feature? Yes. See . -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

In a message of Thu, 01 Oct 2015 08:56:57 +0200, Laura Creighton writes: >management of a large number of lists. It is more common for me to get >mail on lists Subject: I don't understand this error > >Help Hmmm. On further thought, I think that one would go through. Its mail with the subject:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

In a message of Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:35:02 -0400, Steve Matzura writes: >Well now I've seen everything. Why would Mailman send a return message >to a subscriber to a mailing list that says their message couldn't be >posted to the mailing list because "message may contain >administrivia". If your su

[Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

Well now I've seen everything. Why would Mailman send a return message to a subscriber to a mailing list that says their message couldn't be posted to the mailing list because "message may contain administrivia"? -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] message to list does not get forwarded to all list members

On 09/04/2015 06:13 AM, Peter Wetz wrote: > > What is the problem? How can I debug this? Why does the message not get > through to all list members? > > The domain of the source mail is yahoo.com See the wiki at and . -- Mark S

[Mailman-Users] message to list does not get forwarded to all list members

Currently I experience the following issue on my list: If one specific subscriber posts a message to the list, it does not get forwarded to all list members. However, some (at least one) receives his messages. But most, don't receive his message. The message also shows up properly in the list archi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

On 09/04/2014 12:24 PM, Fabio Eckhardt wrote: > > I've been checking the forum on how to automatically reject messages size > at this link: > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-October/058752.html > > The function: > > * if bodylen/1024.0 > mlist.max_message_size: >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

Steve, I've been checking the forum on how to automatically reject messages size at this link: *https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-October/058752.html * The function: * if bodylen/1024.0 > mlist.

[Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

Fabio Eckhardt writes: > ​Is there any easy way to get Mailman messages of large size, only the > "owner" of the list may authorize? And only the smallest message > "moderator" can approve them? > > I'm really getting tired of dealing with those very large messages that > are released by

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

At Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:32:04 -0300 Fabio Eckhardt wrote: > > ​Is there any easy way to get Mailman messages of large size, only the > "owner" of the list may authorize? And only the smallest message > "moderator" can approve them? > > I'm really getting tired of dealing with those very larg

[Mailman-Users] Message of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize

​Is there any easy way to get Mailman messages of large size, only the "owner" of the list may authorize? And only the smallest message "moderator" can approve them? I'm really getting tired of dealing with those very large messages that are released by the moderator.​ -- Fábio --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message order on the moderation page

Mark Sapiro wrote: > > Thanks for that. Unfortunately we're on 2.1.15. I assume > that if we're using a cpanel installation, we need to ask > someone to make this change for us? > > > Two things would need to be done. > > 1) your host would have to upgrade its cPanel installation to > one t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message order on the moderation page

On 02/24/2014 01:31 PM, Peter Shute wrote: > > Thanks for that. Unfortunately we're on 2.1.15. I assume that if we're using > a cpanel installation, we need to ask someone to make this change for us? Two things would need to be done. 1) your host would have to upgrade its cPanel installation t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message order on the moderation page

Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 02/24/2014 10:20 AM, Peter Shute wrote: > > Messages held for moderation are listed in sender order > rather than chronological order. Can that be changed? > > Beginning in Mailman 2.1.16, there is a > DISPLAY_HELD_SUMMARY_SORT_BUTTONS setting. > > The documentation of th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message order on the moderation page

On 02/24/2014 10:20 AM, Peter Shute wrote: > Messages held for moderation are listed in sender order rather than > chronological order. Can that be changed? Beginning in Mailman 2.1.16, there is a DISPLAY_HELD_SUMMARY_SORT_BUTTONS setting. The documentation of this setting from Defaults.py is

[Mailman-Users] Message order on the moderation page

Messages held for moderation are listed in sender order rather than chronological order. Can that be changed? Peter Shute Sent from my iPad -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message bodies empty only on gmail mobile

On 08/08/2013 07:42 AM, Walt Mayo wrote: > I have many users who, when reading list messages using gmail mobile > see only blank/empty body text. Any help with this would be greatly > appreciated. Does your list have a non-empty, possibly whitespace only, msg_header? Can you post a raw message w

[Mailman-Users] Message bodies empty only on gmail mobile

I have many users who, when reading list messages using gmail mobile see only blank/empty body text. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated. Walt -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi

Re: [Mailman-Users] message held for moderation "no member", adding address: "already member"

On 07/26/2013 10:30 AM, kardan wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:03:52 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: >> The member is not posting from his exact subscribed address. E.g. he >> is subscribed as mem...@example.com and is posting from >> mem...@sub.example.com or vice versa or something similar. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] message held for moderation "no member", adding address: "already member"

Hi, On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:03:52 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 07/24/2013 02:54 PM, kardan wrote: > > > > Messages by one specific sender are held for moderation with the > > given reasen, the sender is not part of the list. When it is added, > > mailman says "already a member" (original german:

Re: [Mailman-Users] message held for moderation "no member", adding address: "already member"

On 07/24/2013 02:54 PM, kardan wrote: > > Messages by one specific sender are held for moderation with the given > reasen, the sender is not part of the list. When it is added, mailman > says "already a member" (original german: "Bereits Mitglied"). > > Where is the problem then? The member is

[Mailman-Users] message held for moderation "no member", adding address: "already member"

Version: 2.1.13 Hi, while my first issue was solved with Mark's great support, here is my current problem: Messages by one specific sender are held for moderation with the given reasen, the sender is not part of the list. When it is added, mailman says "already a member" (original german: "Berei

[Mailman-Users] Message from a non-subscriber (Dropbox) on a member-only list

dc writes: > How can a non-subscribed address (From: Dropbox > ) post to a closed mailing list? That would not authorize the post. However, From is not the only datum checked. > Why wasn't this invitation rejected? Because the sender's address appeared in one of the other data used to iden

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message posting and re-enabling membership

Futchko, Rose wrote: > >Understood regarding the discard. In addition, I understand the intent >of the first message as relating to the held message. Therefore, should >the user who posted the message expect to receive a confirmation email >once the post is approved for distribution? If the user

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message posting and re-enabling membership

Sapiro, Mark wrote: >The intent of the message the user sees when their post is held is that the post will be accepted in which case the user receives the list post and knows it was approved, >or the post will be rejected in which case the user receives the rejection. It does not take into accoun

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message posting and re-enabling membership

Futchko, Rose wrote: > >1. I have a user that is not receiving the POST successful message. The >user submits a post and it is held to be released. The message is >released by the moderator and it goes out to all members successfully. >They received an email saying that either the message would be

[Mailman-Users] Message posting and re-enabling membership

Good Afternoon, I am having two challenges with Mailman and could use some guidance. These two items are around message posting and re-enabling membership. 1. I have a user that is not receiving the POST successful message. The user submits a post and it is held to be released. The message is re

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message delivery and Logs

David wrote: > >Mark, In your response above, why did you specify that "list_a-bounces >at example.com" should be added to the recipient's address book >instead of "list_a at example.com"? lis...@example.com or lis...@example.com would never be the "sender" of the mail from the list so 'whitelist

[Mailman-Users] Message delivery and Logs

> Ian Prietz wrote: > > > >We have multiple lists set up with our Mailman host. We have had some > >delivery issues recently. One of the new lists has had some real trouble > >getting the > >messages delivered. However, there are members of "LIST A" that are also > >member of the problem list, "LI

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message delivery and Logs

Ian Prietz wrote: > >We have multiple lists set up with our Mailman host. We have had some >delivery issues recently. Until a few weeks ago, we did not have >DomainKeys or SPF records properly configured for our domain. > >A few of the lists have been active for, I believe, 2 or so years; for >t

[Mailman-Users] Message delivery and Logs

Hi, We have multiple lists set up with our Mailman host. We have had some delivery issues recently. Until a few weeks ago, we did not have DomainKeys or SPF records properly configured for our domain. A few of the lists have been active for, I believe, 2 or so years; for this example, we wil

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message approval by mail

> > >>> From: xservetestlist-requ...@acvr.org >>> Date: July 15, 2011 10:02:09 AM EDT >>> Subject: confirm dda15190a0e5ffa59d0894b92f7a9efface6b70b >>> >>> >>> If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact, >>> Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message approval by mail

Rob wrote: >I am trying to use the option to approve moderated messages using the 'reply' >feature but it doesn't seem to work for me. I add the Approved: >header to my reply as the first line in the body, but the message simply >arrives back in my inbox unmodified, and the moderated message st

[Mailman-Users] Message approval by mail

I am trying to use the option to approve moderated messages using the 'reply' feature but it doesn't seem to work for me. I add the Approved: header to my reply as the first line in the body, but the message simply arrives back in my inbox unmodified, and the moderated message stays in the queu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

Phil wrote: >So as you said earlier, forcing my Yahoo users to select Digest only >with plain text should get them around this problem? I think so. At least then they will receive a digest with messages they can see rather than individual messages they can't see. -- Mark Sapiro The hig

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >As far as the problem with individual messages sent to Yahoo members is >concerned, This is still a Yahoo issue It is hard to believe how stupid Yahoo mail is about this. I just did a test. I sent a message with the MIME structure multipart/mixed text/plain (message he

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

So as you said earlier, forcing my Yahoo users to select Digest only with plain text should get them around this problem? My list only has a few members in this boat. And I need to have both header and footers so the older members and not so computer elite members understand they are part of a C

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

Phil wrote: >Thanks for the answer, but I'm having problems with *NON-Digest* >users. I don't know if anything will change if those with NON-DIGEST >issues convert to text only Digests. Sorry. I was distracted by your reference to "digest options sent out as HTML" and didn't fully comprehend yo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

Mark, Thanks for the answer, but I'm having problems with *NON-Digest* users. I don't know if anything will change if those with NON-DIGEST issues convert to text only Digests. As far as your reply about Digests and MIME, yes - I see issues when I read digests on my iphone. The message comes in

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

Phil wrote: > >It seems like every one of the members on my Mailman server who use >Yahoo for their mail are missing the main body of the e-mail sent to >the group. >I am using Python 2.1.14 on a CentOS VPS. I have the list using a >non-digest and digest options sent out as HTML. I assume you me

[Mailman-Users] Message Body missing from Yahoo Mail users

Hi All, I'm sorry if this was posted earlier, but I didn't see it in my searches through the archives. It seems like every one of the members on my Mailman server who use Yahoo for their mail are missing the main body of the e-mail sent to the group. I am using Python 2.1.14 on a CentOS VPS. I ha

Re: [Mailman-Users] message emails not going out, requests not being recieved

Paul Evenden wrote: >I have been using mailman for over 2 years and since december 2010 it has not >been sending out my group emails nor have I been receiving requests for >subscribing. Nothing has changed that I know of. >how can I test? where do I look? Perhaps Mailman or one or more qrunner

[Mailman-Users] message emails not going out, requests not being recieved

I have been using mailman for over 2 years and since december 2010 it has not been sending out my group emails nor have I been receiving requests for subscribing. Nothing has changed that I know of. how can I test? where do I look? Paul evenden www.copperskymusic.com www.farewellcd.com ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message text not showing up in digests or archives- Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Carl Shuller wrote: >A sporadic number of messages in digest and archives are showing up with out >the original message text and instead "Skipped content of type >multipart/alternative" is showing up. This Scrubber issue was fixed I think in Mailman 2.1.6, The current version is 2.1.14. Perhaps

[Mailman-Users] Message text not showing up in digests or archives - Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

A sporadic number of messages in digest and archives are showing up with out the original message text and instead "Skipped content of type multipart/alternative" is showing up. I did a search and found a few others had experienced this problem some years ago but there wasn't any real follow up to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message for Single List Not Going Out

McNutt Jr, William R wrote: >I have a single list on my server that Is not sending messages out. Other >lists are operating normally. > >Where should I begin my diagnosis? With Mailman's logs. in particular 'error' but also maybe 'locks'. This could be a stale lock. See the FAQ at

[Mailman-Users] Message for Single List Not Going Out

I have a single list on my server that Is not sending messages out. Other lists are operating normally. Where should I begin my diagnosis? Bill -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message rejected by admin got sent out after senderreplied to rejection notice

Anne Anderson wrote: > >We have a mystery going on here at Westmont College... the admin for one of >our lists rejected a message sent by a student, and when the student replied >in some way to the rejection notice, the message that was being held got >sent out. > >This has happened twice now (with

[Mailman-Users] Message rejected by admin got sent out after sender replied to rejection notice

Hello, Mailman experts! Hello, Mailman experts! We have a mystery going on here at Westmont College... the admin for one of our lists rejected a message sent by a student, and when the student replied in some way to the rejection notice, the message that was being held got sent out. This has hap

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message with the attachment!

* Marie-Yvette INGABIRE : > Hello, > > I tried to send a message, which has to be approved by a moderator, with an > attachment. Where did you send it to? > I have just noticed that when the message is approved, it is sent but > arrives at the addressees without that attachment. > > I consulted

[Mailman-Users] Message with the attachment!

Hello, I tried to send a message, which has to be approved by a moderator, with an attachment. I have just noticed that when the message is approved, it is sent but arrives at the addressees without that attachment. I consulted various discussions about subject but I found nothing that can inquir

[Mailman-Users] Message with the attachment!

Hello, I tried to send a message, which has to be approved by a moderator, with an attachment. I have just noticed that when the message is approved, it is sent but arrives at the addressees without that attachment. I consulted various discussions about subject but I found nothing that can inquir

Re: [Mailman-Users] message bounce from good addresses

Rik Pierce wrote: > >We have received some recent bounces from your address. Your current *bounce >score* is 1.0 out of a maximum of 5.0. Please double check that your >subscribed address is correct and that there are no problems with delivery >to this address. Your bounce score will be automatical

[Mailman-Users] message bounce from good addresses

Is this a place to ask for help with Mailman? If not, please point me in the right direction We have 3 mail lists. The big one is a Notify list in which people sign up to get information about events. A smaller one is our members who we enroll to send our newsletter and members info to. I include

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message Delays

* stevenmark1...@aol.com wrote: > Hi i run a mailman list and am having complaints from members because , for > example an email is sent to the list at 0800 hrs and they are not > receiving it until 2300hrs , the members all have different isp mailboxes > from a > variety of isp's , the message

[Mailman-Users] Message Delays

Hi i run a mailman list and am having complaints from members because , for example an email is sent to the list at 0800 hrs and they are not receiving it until 2300hrs , the members all have different isp mailboxes from a variety of isp's , the message is hitting the server from the sender

Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes

Sapiro Cc: Gruver, Sandi; 'mailman-users@python.org' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes Mark Sapiro writes: > Gruver, Sandi wrote: > > 2 possible successful probes > > /mailman/private/sqlhelp///includes/session.php?baseDir=../../ ../../../../../..

Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes

Steff Watkins writes: > > Aha, I see where I went wrong ... /mailman is an Apache ScriptAlias > (or equivalent), isn't it. (I prefer a cgi-bin ScriptAlias so > > it's immediately obvious what the URL is supposed to resolve to.) > They're both "obvious" where they point to if > you look thro

Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes

@python.org' > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes > > Mark Sapiro writes: > > Gruver, Sandi wrote: > > > > 2 possible successful probes > > > > /mailman/private/sqlhelp///includes/session.php?baseDir=../../ ../../../../../../etc/p

Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Mark Sapiro writes: > > Gruver, Sandi wrote: > > > > 2 possible successful probes > > > /mailman/private/sqlhelp///includes/session.php?baseDir=../../../../../../../../etc/passwd > > > HTTP Response 200 > > [...] > > if you look in Mailman's error log, you'll see

Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes

Mark Sapiro writes: > Gruver, Sandi wrote: > > 2 possible successful probes > > /mailman/private/sqlhelp///includes/session.php?baseDir=../../../../../../../../etc/passwd > > HTTP Response 200 > > I saw the same thing in my Logwatch the other day. These messages are > reported in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] message about probes

Gruver, Sandi wrote: >>From the mailman server's Logwatch program: > >A total of 1 sites probed the server > 62.1.205.86 > > 2 possible successful probes > /mailman/private/sqlhelp///includes/session.php?baseDir=../../../../../../../../etc/passwd > HTTP Response 200 > /mailman/admin///includ

  1   2   3   >