Steve Burling writes:
> wasn't getting marked as spam, but the behavior of Constant Contact's
> mailer was causing red flags at our end that caused their mail to be
> blocked.
Ooh! yea. UM always did play tough "D"!
Former-OSU-prof-shouldn't-find-much-to-like-about-UM-but-I-*like*-it-l
--On February 3, 2008 6:42:54 PM -0600 Brad Knowles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/3/08, Jan Steinman wrote:
>
> > One of my clients is considering using a paid service called "Constant
> > Contact" (http://www.constantcontact.com) because they claim they can
> > get through people's spam f
Jan Steinman writes:
> I seem to be gathering a fair number of unrequited pending
> subscriptions on several mailing lists. I see them by grepping for
> "pending" in /var/log/mailman/subscribe, and then checking for
> corresponding "new" entries. I did this after one of my hosting
> c
On 2/3/08, Jan Steinman wrote:
> One of my clients is considering using a paid service called "Constant
> Contact" (http://www.constantcontact.com) because they claim they can
> get through people's spam filters.
Lots of companies have made claims like this. In my experience,
their target ma
Jan Steinman wrote:
>
>I have successfully gone through the subscription process with several
>alias addresses, so I know that it works -- at least from within my LAN.
>
>I can only surmise that the confirmation messages are languishing in
>people's spam mailbox.
Or they are discarding or ign
I seem to be gathering a fair number of unrequited pending
subscriptions on several mailing lists. I see them by grepping for
"pending" in /var/log/mailman/subscribe, and then checking for
corresponding "new" entries. I did this after one of my hosting
clients complained that people were su
