Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Local customizations is beingignored

Emne: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Local customizations is beingignored Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > >I've read*) that to avoid customize the original templates, it is >adviced to > >"Create a directory lists//en (assuming English :) and copy > templates/subscr

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Local customizations is beingignored

Henrik Rasmussen wrote: > >I've read*) that to avoid customize the original templates, it is >adviced to > >"Create a directory lists//en (assuming English :) and copy > templates/subscribeack.txt to this directory. Then edit this file > for your specific wording. Mailman will use this specia

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Local customizations is being ignored

I'm using Mailman 2.1.5. I've read*) that to avoid customize the original templates, it is adviced to "Create a directory lists//en (assuming English :) and copy templates/subscribeack.txt to this directory. Then edit this file for your specific wording. Mailman will use this specialized

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 and Debian upgrades

Alan McConnell wrote: > Dear Helpful Experts, I am hardly an expert, though I do aspire to be helpful. > Can I, again, have the Assembled Wisdom(TM) tell me, and > the PatriotNet staff, how to proceed to upgrade the MM > install from 2.1.5 to 2.1.9? By coincidence, we are a tiny ISP for non-p

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 and Debian upgrades

Dear Helpful Experts, Please have patience! I'll try to make this the last revisit of this subject. I am the admin of a four-month old Mailman E-list, running on my ISP, PatriotNet. The people actually responsible for Tech Support at PatriotNet are very reliant on Debian. They are running Debi

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and S/MIME

Hi, We've been using mailman for ages to manage lists from several of our sites: works fine, running 2.1.5 We are experimenting with S/MIME encryption of mail messages for several reasons. A cursory experiment suggests the even with all content filtering turned off, mailman does not handle S/

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 + HTDig 3.1.6 - New messages make Search Box go away

Something weird is happening with I'm guessing the HyperArch.py script. When I manually do a bin/arch, the search box is there and everything's great. But when a new message comes in for any of the four lists that I've got, the archive gets reindexed, and I lose the search box. Really weird.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

AM To: 'mailman-users@python.org' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question --On July 22, 2005 4:46:07 AM +0900 "Cogley, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My /etc/hosts has one line: > > 200.100.10.1 rcogley.myispsdomain.com rcogley localhost > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

--On July 22, 2005 4:46:07 AM +0900 "Cogley, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My /etc/hosts has one line: > > 200.100.10.1 rcogley.myispsdomain.com rcogley localhost > > ... Which man says is [IP, fqdn, alias, alias] This still looks bogus to me -- localhost is more typically on a line by its

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

Rick; 'mailman-users@python.org' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question Cogley, Rick wrote: > >However, can anyone tell me why lists created in the web interface >default to www.domainofmine.net but lists created from the command line >default to localhost.lo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

ia.com || Japanese: http://www.esolia.co.jp Bilingual IT solutions and management firm -- eSolia. -->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->-->--> -Original Message- From: Steve Burling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

Cogley, Rick wrote: > >However, can anyone tell me why lists created in the web interface default >to www.domainofmine.net but lists created from the command line default to >localhost.localdomain? Of course, I can just run fix_url after every list >creation in the shell script, but, is there a "te

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

Hi everyone - I was experimenting around with for in do, and there is a much cleaner way to write this shell script. Try it short at first to get the concept: = #!/bin/sh for i in support 911 memo sales Do echo $i Done = This scriptlet will just echo four lines

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

ssage- From: Jim Tittsler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:02 PM To: Cogley, Rick Cc: 'mailman-users@python.org' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question On Jul 21, 2005, at 15:38, Cogley, Rick wrote: > # NOTE: bug with quotes > # a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

On Jul 21, 2005, at 15:38, Cogley, Rick wrote: > # NOTE: bug with quotes > # add_virtualhost('DEFAULT_URL_HOST', 'DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST') > add_virtualhost('www.domainofmine.net', 'domainofmine.net') Note that DEFAULT_URL_HOST and DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST are variable names not strings, and so should no

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

MAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cogley, Rick Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 1:55 PM To: 'mailman-users@python.org' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question Apologies - it formatted wrong again, stringing the most relevant line togeth

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

Apologies - it formatted wrong again, stringing the most relevant line together making it looked remarked out. Once more, it is probably obvious to you, this is the relevant line in the config: add_virtualhost('www.domainofmine.net', 'domainofmine.net') This is what works, as opposed to using t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

Hope this formats ok this time. The relevant bit of the config file should look like: ... # NOTE: bug with quotes # add_virtualhost('DEFAULT_URL_HOST', 'DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST') add_virtualhost('www.domainofmine.net', 'domainofmine.net') ... 8<= This is what is working for me.

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - FQDN Question

Hello, and Greetings from Japan - I'm new to the list and to Mailman, but I hope someone more experienced will be able to give me some pointers since I have not been able to get specific info from google or the manual on this problem. Please allow me to explain a little: After installing 2.1.5 fro

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 breaks when I upgrade from postfix 1 to 2

I've been trying to upgrade my FreeBSD 4.8 system from Postfix 1.1.12 to 2.2. Every time I install it, it works fine. However Mailman stops dead. When I uninstall 2.2 and revert to 1.1.12, Mailman is happy again. Looking at the current versions, I suppose I should try for Postfix 2.3 now inst

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5

At 12:10 PM -0500 2005-02-10, larry lunt wrote: Is there an email list i can join for mailman administrators? I currently use 2.1.5 and need help customizing a list. The mailman-users list is the only one currently in operation that I know of. If you find information out about any others, plea

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5

Is there an email list i can join for mailman administrators? I currently use 2.1.5 and need help customizing a list. Larry -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 bad pickle - getting there

Adam Steer wrote: > >...turns out we have just one badly-munged list. So, if anyone knows >how to clean up databases help would be welcome, otherwise, I'm just >retrieving the relevant list info and rebuilding it. Have you tried your config.pck.last? Is it munged too? -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 bad pickle - getting there

Hi folks ...turns out we have just one badly-munged list. So, if anyone knows how to clean up databases help would be welcome, otherwise, I'm just retrieving the relevant list info and rebuilding it. /bin/check_db said: File "/usr/lib/mailman//Mailman/MailList.py", line 566, in __load d

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 bad pickle - something awry here...

Hi folks - help required with a Mailman issue. If I look at either of the listinfo or admin 'list of lists' [http://mailman.site/mailman/listinfo/ or /admin/] I get a 'we've hit a bug response' Here's the traceback --- traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/mailman//scripts/driver",

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 attachment url bug

Larry McMahon-Padolski wrote: Hi, I mean that the URL needs to be prefixed with http://www.domain.com to work. How can I find out that this is fixed it 2.1.6? How can I tell if the lists hostname is set properly? Is this done in the Mailmain admin tool? If you have shell access to your machine

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 attachment url bug

Larry McMahon-Padolski wrote: Hi, When a user attaches a non-txt file, Mailman provides a URL pointing to the attachment. For example: /pipermail/listname_domain.com/attachments/20050201/d8f9df80/ReneeSUMMERSCOURSESCAPP.doc However the proper URL is: http://www.domain.com/pipermail/listname_dom

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 attachment url bug

At 7:01 PM -0600 2005-02-04, Larry McMahon-Padolski wrote: I'm new to the use of Mailman. Has no one else experienced this problem? This is only a problem for Digests mode. Can anyone tell me how to fix this? It's not a bug. The issue is that Mailman doesn't know how to take all the incomin

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 attachment url bug

Hi, I'm new to the use of Mailman. Has no one else experienced this problem? This is only a problem for Digests mode. Can anyone tell me how to fix this? Regards, Larry -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.o

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 attachment url bug

Hi, When a user attaches a non-txt file, Mailman provides a URL pointing to the attachment. For example: /pipermail/listname_domain.com/attachments/20050201/d8f9df80/ReneeSUMMERSCOURSESCAPP.doc However the proper URL is: http://www.domain.com/pipermail/listname_domain.com/attachments/20050201/d8

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 VERP / Sendmail

Mark Sapiro wrote: I'm not a sendmail config expert, but I've used sendmail installations where addresses of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] get delivered in exactly the same way as [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think it works that way by default, See for example http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 VERP / Sendmail

Lauren Weinstein wrote: >Greetings. I'm evaluating Mailman (2.1.5) on some test lists, and >seem to be having a problem getting VERP enabled. I've set what >seem like reasonable values in mm_cfg.py (please see below). >However, envelope From addresses are still un-VERPed (e.g. >[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 VERP / Sendmail

Greetings. I'm evaluating Mailman (2.1.5) on some test lists, and seem to be having a problem getting VERP enabled. I've set what seem like reasonable values in mm_cfg.py (please see below). However, envelope From addresses are still un-VERPed (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) [testing on non-digest immed

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 - genalias not working for postfix?

On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 15:50, Jeffery Cann wrote: > I have seen several threads related to the genalias command. The idea > is that with postfix, when you run genalias (and you have added the > mailman alias files to your postfix main.cf), it will automatically > update your mailman alias file. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 - genalias not working for postfix?

On Sa, Dez 11, 2004 at 01:50:29 -0700, Jeffery Cann wrote: > I have seen several threads related to the genalias command. The idea > is that with postfix, when you run genalias (and you have added the > mailman alias files to your postfix main.cf), it will automatically > update your mailman alias

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 - genalias not working for postfix?

I have seen several threads related to the genalias command. The idea is that with postfix, when you run genalias (and you have added the mailman alias files to your postfix main.cf), it will automatically update your mailman alias file. The problem for me on Fedora Core 3 is that when I set my M

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

Is someone who successfully edited the python code to customize the look of Mailman willing to post their code changes? I have never coded in python and my first (lame) attempts to follow Russell Mann's directions have failed. I am trying to also add a standard header to my installation of Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.5.gz contains Exploit-MIME.gen According to McAfee

You do not say where you are downloading mailman source from but if it is from sourceforge then I doubt you will find the .tgz from there is infected. But there is a test message for the nimda mail virus, which is inactive, in the installation test directory. This may be being misrecognised by

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.5.gz contains Exploit-MIME.genAccording to McAfee

Phil Welch wrote: >FYI > >I just installed McAfee and as it ran through my MS Windows XP files, the only file >it found to contain a virus is mailman-2.1.5.gz. Although I have installed it on my >Linux server, I typically download to my XP workstation and then upload to my server >both as a b

[Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.5.gz contains Exploit-MIME.gen According to McAfee

FYI I just installed McAfee and as it ran through my MS Windows XP files, the only file it found to contain a virus is mailman-2.1.5.gz. Although I have installed it on my Linux server, I typically download to my XP workstation and then upload to my server both as a backup and/or when I don't

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 crashing

At 16:46 12.10.2004 -0400, you wrote: On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 16:18, Sasa Stupar wrote: > Version is 2.1.5 as I stated in the subject. Sorry, finger fumble on my part, you did state that, I meant to ask what python version. I've heard an assertion, but not verified by anything I've seen that running

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 crashing

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 16:18, Sasa Stupar wrote: > Version is 2.1.5 as I stated in the subject. Sorry, finger fumble on my part, you did state that, I meant to ask what python version. I've heard an assertion, but not verified by anything I've seen that running mailman 2.1.5 with anything less than

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 crashing

At 15:53 12.10.2004 -0400, you wrote: On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 03:03, Sasa Stupar wrote: > Hi! > > I have problems with my instalation of mailman on my RH8 box. I had it > installed for quite some time now and few days ago it is starting to crash > without any explanation in any log. And when I try to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 crashing

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 03:03, Sasa Stupar wrote: > Hi! > > I have problems with my instalation of mailman on my RH8 box. I had it > installed for quite some time now and few days ago it is starting to crash > without any explanation in any log. And when I try to restart it first I > have to remo

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 crashing

Hi! I have problems with my instalation of mailman on my RH8 box. I had it installed for quite some time now and few days ago it is starting to crash without any explanation in any log. And when I try to restart it first I have to remove stale pid and then it would start. Can anyone help me to s

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 install on Fedora Core 2 failure

On 9/8/2004 9:13, "Christian Stalberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to install mailman 2.1.5 on RH Linux Fedora Core 2 on > Pentium IV server. When I run 'make install' I get the following > error: > > Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py ... > Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailma

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 install on Fedora Core 2 failure

Trying to install mailman 2.1.5 on RH Linux Fedora Core 2 on Pentium IV server. When I run 'make install' I get the following error: Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py ... Compiling /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/versions.py ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "bin/update", line

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

At 2:04 PM -0400 2004-09-02, David Relson quoted Brad Knowles: For Mailman 2.1.5, you need Python 2.3 or higher. See . AFAICT, Rimgaudaus is reporting that subject "=?windows-1257?Q?=E0=FEe=E1=F8=EB=E6=FB?=" worked fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:40:13 +0200 Brad Knowles wrote: > At 5:16 PM +0200 2004-09-01, Rimgaudas Laucius wrote: > > > But now i see that it is related only to windows encoding (with > > other encodings: ISO, UTF is all right) and i guess it is not > > python problem because i have installed 2.2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

At 5:16 PM +0200 2004-09-01, Rimgaudas Laucius wrote: But now i see that it is related only to windows encoding (with other encodings: ISO, UTF is all right) and i guess it is not python problem because i have installed 2.2.1 version. For Mailman 2.1.5, you need Python 2.3 or higher. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Rimgaudas Laucius wrote: > >i am sorry i was not very consistent describing problem because i was >looking at the problem from the user point at first. That is why i said that >mailman does not pass letters with national characters in subject line. I >was not talking about encoded letter's source.

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Hello, i am sorry i was not very consistent describing problem because i was looking at the problem from the user point at first. That is why i said that mailman does not pass letters with national characters in subject line. I was not talking about encoded letter's source. After i investigeted se

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Hi, We have tested source text of the message sent from our MUA. The subject field was =?windows-1257?Q?=E0=FEe=E1=F8=EB=E6=FB?= So, all characters in ASCII and this mesaage did not go through Mailman. So the problem is not in MUA. What version of Python are you using ? In Python2.1, 'windows-12

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

On 8/30/04 7:31 AM, Brad Knowles at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 3:24 PM +0200 2004-08-30, Rimgaudas Laucius wrote: > >> It only an example with windows-1275 cp. The same result if i code letter >> with iso-8859-13. (i tried to switch on quoted printable and Base 64 >> coding but it does not

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Rimgaudas Laucius wrote: > >i installed mailman 2.1.5 on Linux (rh9). >The problem is with letters where are used national characters (8 bit >[#128..#255] from baltic cp Windows 1257 or ISO-13) in subject line. >Mailman does not pass such letters (discards them without any message). >Earlier ve

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Mark Sapiro wrote: > >RFC2822 section 2.2 says in part: > > Header fields are lines composed of a field name, followed by a colon > (":"), followed by a field body, and terminated by CRLF. A field > name MUST be composed of printable US-ASCII characters (i.e., > characters that have values bet

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Hello, i installed mailman 2.1.5 on Linux (rh9). The problem is with letters where are used national characters (8 bit [#128..#255] from baltic cp Windows 1257 or ISO-13) in subject line. Mailman does not pass such letters (discards them without any message). Earlier version (2.0.14) had not s

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 subject line problem

Hello, i installed mailman 2.1.5 on Linux (rh9). The problem is with letters where are used national characters (8 bit [#128..#255] from baltic cp Windows 1257 or ISO-13) in subject line. Mailman does not pass such letters (discards them without any message). Earlier version (2.0.14) had not s

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 notification of "pending approval requests" is delayed when list in emergency moderation mode.

There is "new behavior" in 2.1.5 re. emergency moderation. If an "un-moderated" member posts a message during emergency moderation, no immediate message is sent to the list owner. Is there a new control to fix this? This is a very annoying bug because we run several low-traffic lists where we

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and virtualdomains and/or subdomains

At 3:37 PM +0200 2004-08-16, Konrad Mauz wrote: Is there a change, that "complete" virtual domain support with "seperated namespaces" will be implemented in a future release of Mailman? This might happen with Mailman 3, yes. You'd have to talk to Barry about where this is on the "wish/priorit

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and virtualdomains and/or subdomains

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:05:35PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 1:03 PM +0200 2004-08-16, Konrad Mauz wrote: > > > but I can only have "one" xyz list, since the domainname is not part of > > the "listname" > > If you had bothered to follow the instructions in the Mailman FAQ > at >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and virtualdomains and/or subdomains

At 1:03 PM +0200 2004-08-16, Konrad Mauz wrote: but I can only have "one" xyz list, since the domainname is not part of the "listname" If you had bothered to follow the instructions in the Mailman FAQ at , you should have f

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and virtualdomains and/or subdomains

Hi, I'm trying to setting up mailman and having trouble with virtualdomains and subdomains. I need a listing name schema of: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on. but I can only have "one" xyz list, since the domainname is not part of the "listname" My first workaro

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

> Sorry, guy. This kind of thing gets back to the same > sorts of issues regarding complete and total customization > such as discussed in > > and > 03

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

At 12:34 PM +0100 2004-08-11, PeteBell wrote: I read the replies with interest. As I do NOT have any access to the config files for the copy of Mailman which I use (because Mailman is a single copy shared across all the domains on the server where I have my site hosted), That's a typical m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

On 11 Aug 2004, at 12:12, Brad Knowles wrote: I've updated the FAQ on this subject. See . I read the replies with interest. As I do NOT have any access to the config files for the copy of Mailman which I use (because Ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

At 3:53 PM -0700 2004-08-10, Russell Mann wrote: Any help would be appreciated. I've Googled and searched the mailing list for the last week, and havn't been able to find the answer. I've updated the FAQ on this subject. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

At 3:53 PM -0700 2004-08-10, Russell Mann wrote: The problem is there are several pages which still are visible to the end user which are not apparently editable. Yup. Some pages are generated internally by the Python code. How can I change the look and feel on these pages, or globally?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

At 6:41 AM +0100 2004-08-11, PeteBell wrote: ...And further to this, (which might help solve Russell's problem), is it possible to get Mailman returned pages (like the roster, archives, members list, subscription results, options, password log in, etc, etc, etc) to appear inside an existing lay

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

On 10 Aug 2004, at 23:53, Russell Mann wrote: Everything is working fine, but I want to customize the look and feel to match my existing site. ...And further to this, (which might help solve Russell's problem), is it possible to get Mailman returned pages (like the roster, archives, members lis

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 - Customize Look and Feel

Hello, I have recently installed Mailman 2.1.5 on Fedora Core 1 in concert with a Qmail and Vpopmail installation, using some instructions to make a unique install for each virtual domain under /home/mailman/. Everything is working fine, but I want to customize the look and feel to match my exist

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and htdig (2.1.4) patch compatibility?

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:38:56AM -0400, michael dunston wrote: > Does anyone know whether the current htdig-2.1.4-0.1.patch (#444884) > is compatibile with Mailman 2.1.5? I found it necessary to make some very minor changes in line numbers in order to apply cleanly. Contact me off-list if you'

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 and htdig (2.1.4) patch compatibility?

Does anyone know whether the current htdig-2.1.4-0.1.patch (#444884) is compatibile with Mailman 2.1.5? If not, can Mailman 2.1.4 be downloaded from somewhere? The Sourceforge downloads page only seems to have links for version 2.1.5. Thanks. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Michael Dunston -- Music a

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 without nls

How do I avoid installing support for lots of languages I don't need when installing Mailman 2.1.5? -- John -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.pyth

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

Installed the new tarball, upgrade from 2.1.4 to 2.1.5, no problems so far. A few things I noticed (already present earlier, not 2.1.5 specific, but now I took note), should I report any of them via bugtracker or is this intentional? - all programs show up as "python" in top, would be nice to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

Barry Warsaw wrote on Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:47:34 -0400: > If you upgrade you should do so only on a quiet system. I recommend > shutting down Mailman, your MTA, and your web server before doing the > upgrade. Please note any problems you have with the conversion scripts > (you may want to make ba

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

As Barry Warsaw wrote: > I've just uploaded Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2 (no, you never saw > rc1 :). Since there are some fairly significant changes with this > version, I felt it was necessary to put out a release candidate to > hopefully prompt some additional testing. Is there any chanc

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

I've just uploaded Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2 (no, you never saw rc1 :). Since there are some fairly significant changes with this version, I felt it was necessary to put out a release candidate to hopefully prompt some additional testing. If you're able to test the new version, that would

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 and Exim 3.6

From: "wiren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "mailman-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:14 AM Subject: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 and Exim 3.6 > Dear All > > > I have mailman 2.1.5 and Exim 3.6 under a mixed Debian sistem. I had >

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.5 and Exim 3.6

Dear All I have mailman 2.1.5 and Exim 3.6 under a mixed Debian sistem. I had to specifically install the "unstable" packet to have the latest mailman version. Now, I went through the readme.exim file into the documentation and made some changes into exim.conf file to update th