Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 new features

2010-10-21 Thread Barry Finkel
On Oct 20, 2010, at 01:53 PM, Adam McGreggor wrote: >>It appears that 'official' Mailman packages for lenny are a wee bit >>behind upstream. >> >>I believe others on this list use the Umbungo packages on lenny >>(Debian 5), without too many difficulties. YMMV. >> >>(I don't really have the time to

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 new features

2010-10-21 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Oct 20, 2010, at 01:53 PM, Adam McGreggor wrote: >It appears that 'official' Mailman packages for lenny are a wee bit >behind upstream. > >I believe others on this list use the Umbungo packages on lenny >(Debian 5), without too many difficulties. YMMV. > >(I don't really have the time to take

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 new features

2010-10-20 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:46:31PM +0200, Alessandro Bruchi wrote: > Do you know when mailman 2.1.14 will be included as package in some debian > distribution? The XSS patch, per 2010-September's announcement, seems to now be in Debian's repositories: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 new features

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Sapiro
"Alessandro Bruchi" wrote: >Does mailman 2.1.14 solve the virtual domain problem? >In particular the ability to create: > >l...@domain1 >l...@domain2 No. >I read that the new version support virtual domains. That support is in MM 3. It is not yet ready for production use. >Do you know

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.14 new features

2010-10-15 Thread Alessandro Bruchi
Does mailman 2.1.14 solve the virtual domain problem? In particular the ability to create: l...@domain1 l...@domain2 I read that the new version support virtual domains. Do you know when mailman 2.1.14 will be included as package in some debian distribution? Thank you Alessandro --