Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0.8 problems

2002-02-25 Thread Alan L. Waller
At 09:05 AM 2/25/2002 -0600, Thomas Hillson wrote: >These lists vary from 10 users to 150 and there are not dead addresses as >they have been running for over 6 months clean, then the problem crops up >where the qrunner justs starts messing up. I have over 100 lists on my >servers and only abou

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0.8 problems

2002-02-25 Thread Thomas Hillson
These lists vary from 10 users to 150 and there are not dead addresses as they have been running for over 6 months clean, then the problem crops up where the qrunner justs starts messing up. I have over 100 lists on my servers and only about six that are causing problems. At 3:59 PM -0800 2/2

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0.8 problems

2002-02-22 Thread Morgan Fletcher
Thomas Hillson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The first involves qrunner, what happens is that a list gets locked and no > mail will go through it. Tom, when I first moved my 1800-member list to mailman, it had upwards of 200 dead addresses. Those 200 dead addresses caused a lot of bounces, and f

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0.8 problems

2002-02-22 Thread Thomas Hillson
I have two problems happening right now with MailMan 2.0.8 The first involves qrunner, what happens is that a list gets locked and no mail will go through it. This is what is shown in the log. The lock is created in the locks directory, the qrunner process is no longer running and the message