At 14:49 27/08/2002 +0200, Kaja P. Christiansen wrote:
>Odhiambo Washington writes:
>
> > Probably the way you downloaded the patches...
> > How did you do it?
> > I've downloaded them before and they applied cleanly.
>
>Thanks! The patch file must have been corrupted. I downloaded
>it again a
Richard Barrett writes:
> It looks as though you may not have applied the precursor
> indexing-2.0.13-0.2.patch
Yes, that is correct - I forgot to apply the indexing patch :(
The indexing patch followed by htdig patch applied cleanly.
Thank you for pointing it out.
Kaja
-
At 14:49 27/08/2002 +0200, Kaja P. Christiansen wrote:
>Odhiambo Washington writes:
>
> > Probably the way you downloaded the patches...
> > How did you do it?
> > I've downloaded them before and they applied cleanly.
>
>Thanks! The patch file must have been corrupted. I downloaded
>it again a
Odhiambo Washington writes:
> Probably the way you downloaded the patches...
> How did you do it?
> I've downloaded them before and they applied cleanly.
Thanks! The patch file must have been corrupted. I downloaded
it again and the result is better, but the patch doesn't apply
quite cleanl
* Kaja P. Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020827 15:14]: wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After unpacking the sources for mailman v. 2.0.13,
> I tried to apply htdig-2.0.13-0.1.patch which failed.
> Then I noticed the htdig-2.0.13-0.2.patch. Unfortunately
> this patch is failing too:
>
>[mailman-2
Hi,
After unpacking the sources for mailman v. 2.0.13,
I tried to apply htdig-2.0.13-0.1.patch which failed.
Then I noticed the htdig-2.0.13-0.2.patch. Unfortunately
this patch is failing too:
[mailman-2.0.13]$ patch -p1 < htdig-2.0.13-0.2.patch
patching file INSTALL
patching file
