RE: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Keith Mastin
>What you don't know (because you've never done it before) is that >installing via the Source is actually easier with Mailman than >installing via the RPM. > >Installing via the RPM is buggy and only works if no default has been >touched - plus you still need to do all the work that is associated w

RE: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Jon Carnes
nuary 28, 2003 9:07 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Parker, David K wrote: > > I'm almost at a point where I've either got to scrap ma

RE: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Parker, David K
: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and python2 instead of sendmail and python), and can give anyone who wants it a diff. The [beta] packages are available here

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Justin Georgeson
The RPM from RawHide isn't supported on RedHat 7.3 (or technically anywhere, since RawHide is the beta distro). RedHat 7.3 has /usr/bin/python (a 1.x binary from the 'python') and /usr/bin/python2 (a 2.x binary from the 'python2'). I had to configure the spec file to depend on the python2 packa

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Simon White
> Simon White wrote: > >29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > >>I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over > >>Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and > >>python2 instead of sendmail and python), and can g

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Justin Georgeson
See my previous post. :) Simon White wrote: 29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and python2 instead of sendmail and python), a

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon White wrote: > Funny that they should miss the key dependency: Mailman requires > python2... They don't, the requires line from the rawhide rpm is: Requires: webserver, python >= 2.2.1, mktemp Apparently rawhide uses python-2 by default in

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Justin Georgeson
They didn't miss it, the RPM is aimed at RedHat 8, which has python 2. RedHat 7.3 has two packages, python and python2, so you have to build it using /usr/bin/python2 instead of /usr/bin/python (--with-python option to configure) Simon White wrote: 29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL P

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Simon White
29-Jan-03 at 10:30, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > I have the latest package from RedHat (2.1-7) running on RedHat 7.3 over > Postfix 1.7. I had to change the spec file slightly (use postfix and > python2 instead of sendmail and python), and can give anyone who wants > it a diff.

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Justin Georgeson
iginal Message- From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Parker, David K wrote: I'm almost at a point where I've either

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Simon White
29-Jan-03 at 09:27, Parker, David K ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Apparently the RPM was set expect Postfix MTA to run as mail. I'm guessing > the RedHat standard is to run MTA as nobody. I do appreciate the efforts of > the person who put the rpm out. I've got the list back up on another RedHat >

RE: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-29 Thread Parker, David K
TED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 9:07 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Parker, David K wrote: > I'm almost at a point where I've either got to scrap mailman > completely and

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-28 Thread Jon Carnes
Install clean from source, be sure to point the ./configure script to your Pyton2.2.1 executable. Good Luck - Jon Carnes On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 23:01, Parker, David K wrote: > I've been fighting problems after upgrading Mailman 2.0x to 2.1-1 using > mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm. I'm making headway but n

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-28 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Parker, David K wrote: > I'm almost at a point where I've either got to scrap mailman completely > and revert to an earlier rpm or install clean from source. Any suggestions > would be appreciated. If you're banging your head against the wall, uninsta

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-28 Thread Keith Mastin
>I've been fighting problems after upgrading Mailman 2.0x to 2.1-1 using >mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm. I'm making headway but now mailmanctl terminates >with the following error: > ># /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailmanctl start >Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/etc/rc.d/init.d/mailmanctl", line 104, i

[Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm

2003-01-28 Thread Parker, David K
I've been fighting problems after upgrading Mailman 2.0x to 2.1-1 using mailman-2.1-1.i386.rpm. I'm making headway but now mailmanctl terminates with the following error: # /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailmanctl start Traceback (most recent call last): File "/etc/rc.d/init.d/mailmanctl", line 104, in ?