Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
Marco De Rossi wrote: > >Marco De Rossi wrote: > >>We use X.509 certificate. >>Could I send to the list a little attachment to see if problem is present >>with mailman-users mailing list too? The message you sent has a PKCS7 (RFC 2315) signature. Of course, the signature was broken by the mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Marco De Rossi
Test Marco De Rossi Marco De Rossi wrote: We use X.509 certificate. Could I send to the list a little attachment to see if problem is present with mailman-users mailing list too? Thanks, Marco De Rossi On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Mark Sapiro wrote: Marco De Rossi wrote: I tried to tur

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Marco De Rossi
I used Netscape Mail v7.2 and Mozilla Thunderbird v2.0.0.6 with X.509 Certificate. Marco De Rossi On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Marco De Rossi wrote: > > >If it could be helpful: it seems happen only sending e-mail from a Windows > >XP operating system (sending e-mail from a linu

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
Marco De Rossi wrote: >If it could be helpful: it seems happen only sending e-mail from a Windows >XP operating system (sending e-mail from a linux OS the digital signature >is OK). What (broken?) mail client on Windows and what kind of signature? See my other reply at

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Marco De Rossi
We use X.509 certificate. Could I send to the list a little attachment to see if problem is present with mailman-users mailing list too? Thanks, Marco De Rossi On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Marco De Rossi wrote: > > >I tried to turn off all "Content Filtering" but it didn't fixed

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Marco De Rossi
If it could be helpful: it seems happen only sending e-mail from a Windows XP operating system (sending e-mail from a linux OS the digital signature is OK). Thanks, Marco De Rossi On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Marco De Rossi wrote: > I tried to turn off all "Content Filtering" but it didn't fixed the

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
Marco De Rossi wrote: >I tried to turn off all "Content Filtering" but it didn't fixed the >signature problem. >Some other suggestion? > >Thanks, Marco De Rossi > > >On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Brad Knowles wrote: > >> On 8/2/07, Marco De Rossi wrote: >> >> > We have modifed mailman so now it not add t

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-30 Thread Marco De Rossi
I tried to turn off all "Content Filtering" but it didn't fixed the signature problem. Some other suggestion? Thanks, Marco De Rossi On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Brad Knowles wrote: > On 8/2/07, Marco De Rossi wrote: > > > We have modifed mailman so now it not add the message footer anymore. > > Now

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-02 Thread Brad Knowles
On 8/2/07, Marco De Rossi wrote: > We have modifed mailman so now it not add the message footer anymore. > Now we still have this problem only when we send digital signed e-mail > *with attachment*. I can see two likely possibilities: 1. The digital signature is being done against th

[Mailman-Users] mailman, attachment and digital sign

2007-08-02 Thread Marco De Rossi
Hello, we have installed "Mailman, the GNU Mailing List Manager" version 2.1.5 If we send a digital signed e-mail *with attachment* to a list we obtain the following message: Digital Signature Is Not Valid This message includes a digital signature, but the signature is invalid. The