On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 06:58 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
> > I have a message in a moderation queue. It's from a member (everyone is
> > moderated on this list) so I think it's not spam or other junk. But when
> I
> > click to review it, it's not legible. T
On 09/22/2016 06:58 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
> I have a message in a moderation queue. It's from a member (everyone is
> moderated on this list) so I think it's not spam or other junk. But when I
> click to review it, it's not legible. This is all I see in the message
> excerpt:
>
> IENvbnNkaXNsaXN0
In article <57e49a8d.1030...@sgeinc.com> you write:
> From a quick look, it looks like base64 encoding. Invented back in the
>dialup/uucp days when transport was not always 8bit clean so things were
>encoded to make sure only transportable characters were used.
Well, actually, we uucp users use
From a quick look, it looks like base64 encoding. Invented back in the
dialup/uucp days when transport was not always 8bit clean so things were
encoded to make sure only transportable characters were used.
On 9/22/2016 9:58 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
I have a message in a moderation queue. It's f
On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:58 PM, Matt Morgan wrote:
>
> I have a message in a moderation queue. It's from a member (everyone is
> moderated on this list) so I think it's not spam or other junk. But when I
> click to review it, it's not legible. This is all I see in the message
> excerpt:
>
> IENvbnN
I have a message in a moderation queue. It's from a member (everyone is
moderated on this list) so I think it's not spam or other junk. But when I
click to review it, it's not legible. This is all I see in the message
excerpt:
IENvbnNkaXNsaXN0DQoNCrOqwMcgaVBob25lv6G8rSC6uLO/
I feel like I've seen
