Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-17 Thread George Theall
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:31:00PM -0700, John W. Baxter wrote: > I would guess that nogood.k12.il.us uses /x in much the same way other > servers use +x. Such addresses are characteristic of HP OpenMail (aka Samsung Contact), and indeed if you go to (the actua

Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
John W. Baxter wrote: > >Does Mailman accept the alternative legal form of the address: > "weincek_g/li"@nogood.k12.il.us No. Same result as unquoted. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan --

Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-16 Thread John W. Baxter
On 9/16/2004 17:59, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John W. Baxter wrote: >> >> But that / isn't in the list name, it is in the local part of a (would-be) >> subscribed address. At least as I read the question. >> >> I would indeed expect Mailman to prohibit a / in a list name. >> >

Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
John W. Baxter wrote: > >But that / isn't in the list name, it is in the local part of a (would-be) >subscribed address. At least as I read the question. > >I would indeed expect Mailman to prohibit a / in a list name. > Yes, and apparently it also prohibits it in a subscriber address. I tried su

Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-16 Thread John W. Baxter
On 9/16/2004 8:15, "Ian Eiloart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --On Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:04 am -0700 "John W. Baxter" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 9/12/2004 20:15, "Al Mellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> we are having a problem with the following type of email addres

Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-16 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:04 am -0700 "John W. Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9/12/2004 20:15, "Al Mellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: we are having a problem with the following type of email address weincek_g/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it seems that the forward slash is having mailman li

Re: [Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-16 Thread John W. Baxter
On 9/12/2004 20:15, "Al Mellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we are having a problem with the following type of email address > > weincek_g/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > it seems that the forward slash is having mailman listserv reject this email > address and any others loke it. Is there a way around

[Mailman-Users] illeagal email address

2004-09-16 Thread Al Mellis
we are having a problem with the following type of email address weincek_g/[EMAIL PROTECTED] it seems that the forward slash is having mailman listserv reject this email address and any others loke it. Is there a way around it? al Mellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]