Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches to be updated for 2.1.14?

2010-12-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
Chris Toomey wrote: > Great, thanks Mark. Will you or someone else be updating the sourceforge > patches with these? Would be nice to keep the patches for various mm > versions consolidated there. The SourceForge tracker is no longer used for Mailman. The current tracker is at Launchpad. The s

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches to be updated for 2.1.14?

2010-12-07 Thread Chris Toomey
Great, thanks Mark. Will you or someone else be updating the sourceforge patches with these? Would be nice to keep the patches for various mm versions consolidated there. Chris On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Chris Toomey wrote: > > > >Can somebody update those patches f

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches to be updated for 2.1.14?

2010-12-06 Thread Mark Sapiro
Chris Toomey wrote: > >Can somebody update those patches for 2.1.14, or should I just go with >2.1.10? Also, I've not been able to find any documentation on the changes >made in each mailman release so it's hard to tell what I'd be giving up in >going w/ 2.1.10 -- can someone point me to where tha

[Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches to be updated for 2.1.14?

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Toomey
Hi, I'd like to do a fresh install of mailman with the htdig integration as described at http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg11713.html . However, the 2 patches were last updated for mailman 2.1.10 and mailman's now up to version 2.1.14. Can somebody update those patches for 2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-23 Thread Steve Huston
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Richard Barrett wrote: > In response to your input I have posted a revised version of patch #444884 > for MM 2.1 on sourceforge as file htdig-2.1-0.3.patch > Thanks for your heads up on the problem and your observation. Sorry for the > errors. Your suggested change was not qu

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Barrett
At 16:21 22/01/2003, Todd C. Miller wrote: After a bit of head scratching I have tracked the problem down to privoxy (a filtering, ad-blocking proxy). It has the following rule in its default config: # The status bar is for displaying link targets, not pointless blahblah # s/([\n =;{}]|window\.)

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-22 Thread Todd C. Miller
After a bit of head scratching I have tracked the problem down to privoxy (a filtering, ad-blocking proxy). It has the following rule in its default config: # The status bar is for displaying link targets, not pointless blahblah # s/([\n =;{}]|window\.)(default)?status\s*=/$1dUmMy=/ig which is w

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Barrett
Todd It would help to know which version of the patch file you are using and where you got it from. I have grep'ed my copies of the various versions of my htdig patch file and cannot find a line that reads as you assert yours does; see the grep results below. There are three lines containing

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-22 Thread Todd C. Miller
I also get the following error from nightly_htdig: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/mailman/cron/nightly_htdig", line 153, in ? main() File "/var/mailman/cron/nightly_htdig", line 138, in main if status: NameError: global name 'status' is not defined Which corresponds to

Re: [Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-22 Thread Richard Barrett
Steve In response to your input I have posted a revised version of patch #444884 for MM 2.1 on sourceforge as file htdig-2.1-0.3.patch Thanks for your heads up on the problem and your observation. Sorry for the errors. Your suggested change was not quite right; good try but no cigar.:) I've co

[Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches

2003-01-21 Thread Steve Huston
I've applied the patches, but have had a few problems. I emailed Richard Barrett through sourceforge, and don't know if you got it, so I'll start with what I've figured out since then. Should line 1485 of htdig-2.1-0.2.patch read "if (not ctype) or cencode:" instead of reading "if not (ctype an

[Mailman-Users] htdig integration patches bug fixed (I hope)

2003-01-16 Thread Richard Barrett
If you use my Mailman/htdig integration patches and are using MM 2.1 final you will definitely find the new version of the #444884 patch I have just uploaded useful. This revised patch incorporates a fix for a fairly gross bug in $prefix/Mailman/Cgi/htdig.py; don't ask: the embarrassment is too