On 9/15/07, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> So at this point it simply wouldn't continue any further, and
> smtp-failures actually logs the address after the faulty one as the one
> causing a problem.
To avoid this problem in the future, try enabling personalization on
the list, and using VERP. Then Mai
Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
>Ok. That covers the 4xx and 5xx responses to rcpt to:, what happens if
>the MTA simply closes the connection? What I gathered the smtp
>conversation had to look like was something like:
>
>S: 220 servername ESMTP Exim
>C: helo s
Hi,
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> What I want to know is how mailman handles the message delivery runs.
>> Afaik each message that needs to go out is stored in some location,
>> along with a list of recipients, so periodically mailman checks which
>> messages needs to go out, and to wh
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>If you are proficient in Python, you could write a short script to
>unpickle the message and metadata from the file, remove the bad
>recipient from recips and repickle the message and metadata. then you
>could put the file in qfiles/out for delivery. (I'm currently
>debugging
Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
>What I want to know is how mailman handles the message delivery runs.
>Afaik each message that needs to go out is stored in some location,
>along with a list of recipients, so periodically mailman checks which
>messages needs to go out, and to which recipients, and it then trie
Hi guys,
We've got a problem with a half-completed delivery run, somehow an
address with a ? at the end of the domain managed to get into the list
addresses, ie, something like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... now exim drops the connection when it sees this
address, which m
