Stoyan Angelov wrote:
>
>thanks for your comment. the machine is fairly secured, however i do
>prefer not to expose any such information in "returned mail" messages.
The alternative is to remove the aliases for the list. The downside of
that is you won't get any Mailman logging and the DSN will
On 09/18/10 15:49, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
hello Mark,
thank you for your answer! very helpful as always; please excuse my
very late reply...
i did the test with sending a test message to a bogus alias - the
good thing is that in the returned message there is some info:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Stoyan Angelov wrote:
> On 08/24/10 18:28, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Stoyan Angelov wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> i want to temporary disable one of my mailing lists while keeping the
>>> archives available. i run mailman 2.1.12 with sendmail. i was thinking
>>> about doing the
On 08/24/10 18:28, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Stoyan Angelov wrote:
i want to temporary disable one of my mailing lists while keeping the
archives available. i run mailman 2.1.12 with sendmail. i was thinking
about doing the following:
. remove the appropriate aliases from /path/to/aliases (redirectin
Stoyan Angelov wrote:
>
>i want to temporary disable one of my mailing lists while keeping the
>archives available. i run mailman 2.1.12 with sendmail. i was thinking
>about doing the following:
>
>. remove the appropriate aliases from /path/to/aliases (redirecting the
>-owner of the affected li
hello all,
i want to temporary disable one of my mailing lists while keeping the
archives available. i run mailman 2.1.12 with sendmail. i was thinking
about doing the following:
. remove the appropriate aliases from /path/to/aliases (redirecting the
-owner of the affected list to some real
