Jim Dory writes:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:39 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
> turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> > (You probably should also disable the Digestable option in
> > [Digest options]
When I wrote this, I was thinking of a new list, in the context of
personalization as a ha
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:19 PM Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> Does your outgoing MTA add an X-Ham-Report: header? Perhaps it does so
> in a non-compliant way.
>
>
> > is disabling the digest option something people do regularly to
> > prevent issues like this? and if so - if I were to disable it now, wh
On 3/18/19 6:44 PM, Jim Dory wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:39 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
> turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>>
>> (You probably should
>> also disable the Digestable option in [Digest options]
>>
>
> I'm also receiving several bounces back for errors such as:
>
On 3/18/2019 8:44 PM, Jim Dory wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:39 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
(You probably should
also disable the Digestable option in [Digest options]
I'm also receiving several bounces back for errors such as:
"SMTP error fr
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:39 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> (You probably should
> also disable the Digestable option in [Digest options]
>
I'm also receiving several bounces back for errors such as:
"SMTP error from remote mail server after end of dat
On 3/18/19 5:39 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> If you mean any other kind of delivery failure that is detected by the
> Mailman host, but is not returned to Mailman, then it is simply
> impossible for Mailman to even be aware of them, and you would have to
> check the MTA (mail server) logs.
Davide Marchi writes:
> 1) How is it possible from Mailman monitor the delivery errors? Only
> sysadmin mail server from the logs?
That depends on what you mean by "monitor" and "delivery errors". If
you mean mail refused by some system (typically the final recipient)
and returned to Mailman,
On 3/18/2019 4:51 AM, Davide Marchi wrote:
1) How is it possible from Mailman monitor the delivery errors? Only
sysadmin mail server from the logs?
This is what VERP deliveries are for. The FROM address is tagged so that
bounces can be clearly identified.
https://wiki.list.org/DOC/So%20what%2
Hi Friends,
I have a few doubts, I write you in the hope of a hint.
For Mailman 2.1.23 on Debian Stretch:
1) How is it possible from Mailman monitor the delivery errors? Only
sysadmin mail server from the logs?
2) Is it possible avoid spam grading, increasing the number of sending
sessions/dec
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 20:27 +0530, Amit Bhatt wrote:
> Could not exec '/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman'
This should be a simple exercise in basic Linux system administration,
and someone at your hosting service, even a novice or an intern, should
be able to figure it out
What user
On 04/20/2014 07:57 AM, Amit Bhatt wrote:
> All the subscribers of my mailing list are unable to post the messages and
> getting the below error in return:
> The service provider is not being able to get the solution, any advise from
> anyone?
...
> Could not exec '/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mai
All the subscribers of my mailing list are unable to post the messages and
getting the below error in return:
The service provider is not being able to get the solution, any advise from
anyone?
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not
On 19/12/2013 06:10 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
In other words, you don't need to change anything in Exim for virtual
domains with a single Mailman instance, but you do need an
add_virtualhost('virtual.web.domain', 'virtual.email.domain')
line in mm_cfg.py for each virtual host in addition to defin
On 12/18/2013 06:32 PM, MP Netsai wrote:
>
> What I would rather need to have is a single instance of Mailman
> handling several domains with their separate urls. Not sure if that
> makes any sense?
It makes sense, but it carries the restriction that list names must be
globally unique. I.e. if y
On 17/12/2013 09:11 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/16/2013 07:41 PM, MP Netsai wrote:
> Can someone please point me in the right direction. I have just recently
> built Mailman for virtual domains. I have followed the guidelines on
> section 6.2.12 (Virtual Domains)
> {http://www.list.org/mailman-
On 12/16/2013 07:41 PM, MP Netsai wrote:
> Can someone please point me in the right direction. I have just recently
> built Mailman for virtual domains. I have followed the guidelines on
> section 6.2.12 (Virtual Domains)
> {http://www.list.org/mailman-install/node28.html}.
Those instructions ass
Can someone please point me in the right direction. I have just recently
built Mailman for virtual domains. I have followed the guidelines on section
6.2.12 (Virtual Domains) {http://www.list.org/mailman-install/node28.html}.
I am using Exim 4.80 and Mailman 2.1.14 on a FreeBSD 9.1. The error on
Damijan Sencar wrote:
>After resolving file system space problems we noticed that our mailman
>system doesn't work any more.
>i.e. sending mail do mail list resulted in following error in
>/var/log/mailman/smtp-failure file:
>
>
> failed with code -1: Server not connected
>
>I restarted ma
Hi!
I have problem with my postfix/mailman system (CentOS
mailman-2.1.9-4.el5, postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2).
It has been working well 3+ years.
During the weekend our root file system run out of space.
After resolving file system space problems we noticed that our mailman
system doesn't work any more.
On 7/20/2010 2:28 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Esteban Torres wrote:
>>
>> configure SMTP_MAX_RCPTS = 2700?
>
> I think you can leave it as it is or just bump it a bit. Leaving it as
> it is means Mailman will do 6 runs for your list. If you make it 900,
> th
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Esteban Torres wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:58:56 +0300
> Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Esteban Torres wrote:
>> >
>> > I have configured a list of 150 members and everything works fine.
>> >
>> > Now I want to create anoth
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:58:56 +0300
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Esteban Torres wrote:
> >
> > I have configured a list of 150 members and everything works fine.
> >
> > Now I want to create another list with 1885 members. I have to change
> > something in the c
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Esteban Torres wrote:
>
> I have configured a list of 150 members and everything works fine.
>
> Now I want to create another list with 1885 members. I have to change
> something in the configuration of mailman?
>
> There is some limitation in the default configu
I have configured a list of 150 members and everything works fine.
Now I want to create another list with 1885 members. I have to change something
in the configuration of mailman?
There is some limitation in the default configuration of mailman to deliver as
many members?
In the configuration
Kris Johnson wrote:
>When a bounce occurs due to a bad email address, all my list members receive
>an email stating "Delivery Error, Your message was not delivered
>successfully." Then the original message is repeated. Can I configure
>mailman to only send this message to the administrator or not
When a bounce occurs due to a bad email address, all my list members receive
an email stating "Delivery Error, Your message was not delivered
successfully." Then the original message is repeated. Can I configure
mailman to only send this message to the administrator or not send the
message at all?
On Mar 10, 2010, at 05:51 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>Good news (kinda) - another list on that server just started to slow
>down, and this time, it is a very unimportant and small list (472
>members, 466 of them have mail delivery enabled), so I can take all
>the time in the world to try and debug
Stefan Foerster wrote:
>* Mark Sapiro :
>
>[instructions for list duplication /SMTP redirection]
>> Unfortunately, I don't have any good ideas as to how to proceed from
>> there, even if this does duplicate the problem, but Barry indicated he
>> has a couple of ideas.
>
>Well, unfortunately, this
* Mark Sapiro :
> On 2/21/2010 2:15 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> >
> > Bad news. I was not able to reproduce the problem on a VM, using
> > backups from the day the problem first occured. And worse, this night,
> > while I slept a troubled, disturbed sleep, dreaming of SMTP dialogues,
> > the list
On 2/21/2010 2:15 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>
> Bad news. I was not able to reproduce the problem on a VM, using
> backups from the day the problem first occured. And worse, this night,
> while I slept a troubled, disturbed sleep, dreaming of SMTP dialogues,
> the list roster changed (one new mem
On Feb 20, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>As expected, Postfix is not the culprit. Delivery to smtp-sink is
>running at the speed of molasses, too.
Now this is getting interesting .
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2010-February/068829.html
has some perplexing numbers.
* Stefan Foerster :
> * Mark Sapiro :
> > As I said, I think it would just be the config.pck. Everything else is
> > open source software, but I don't think I want it. It's not that I'm not
> > curious because I definitely am, but I don't want to accidentally send
> > mail to any of the list member
On Feb 20, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> What is a "smaller sub-list"? The list in question does only hold 11k
> recipients, which is not exactly large. Some off my SVN announce lists
> are much larger.
Yeah, but an announce-only list that is larger doesn't really compare to a
discu
Hi!
...[very slow list]...
Seen from a very abstract standpoint, is there some pattern in
the adresses to send? Some sorting algorithms go completely
bonkers if fed with the wrong kind of pre-sorted or patterned
input list. I did NOT look into this (not knowing enough python
yet), but having st
* Brad Knowles :
> On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> > As I said, I think it would just be the config.pck. Everything
> > else is open source software, but I don't think I want it. It's
> > not that I'm not curious because I definitely am, but I don't want
> > to accidentally sen
* Mark Sapiro :
> On 2/20/2010 12:56 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> > So, if you are personally interested in this, I would talk to a lawyer
> > to find a way how I can legally provide you with a copy of every file
> > that is in any way related to this list.
>
> As I said, I think it would just be
* Barry Warsaw :
> On Feb 20, 2010, at 09:56 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> >So, if you are personally interested in this, I would talk to a lawyer
> >to find a way how I can legally provide you with a copy of every file
> >that is in any way related to this list.
> >
> >If you are not _that_ interes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/20/2010 1:38 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> Take a look at lazr.smtptest, which is what MM3 uses in its test framework.
>
> https://edge.launchpad.net/lazr.smtptest
Thanks Barry,
That's helpful.
- --
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamb
On Feb 20, 2010, at 01:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>As I said, I think it would just be the config.pck. Everything else is
>open source software, but I don't think I want it. It's not that I'm not
>curious because I definitely am, but I don't want to accidentally send
>mail to any of the list member
On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> As I said, I think it would just be the config.pck. Everything else is
> open source software, but I don't think I want it. It's not that I'm not
> curious because I definitely am, but I don't want to accidentally send
> mail to any of the list mem
On 2/20/2010 12:56 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>
> I fear I've got a decision to make here: To "fix" that problem, I'd
> normally simply export the recipient list and recreate the mailing
> list thereafter. But since we don't know what causes this behaviour, I
> can't be sure that my backups includ
On Feb 20, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> Have you tried any of the Postfix debugging strategies?
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
>
>Yes he did.
>Stefan usually knows what he's doing :)
Ah, sorry about that!
culling-inbox-during-pycon-talk-ly y'rs,
-Barry
signatu
* Barry Warsaw :
> Have you tried any of the Postfix debugging strategies?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
Yes he did.
Stefan usually knows what he's doing :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Fr
On Feb 20, 2010, at 09:56 PM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>I fear I've got a decision to make here: To "fix" that problem, I'd
>normally simply export the recipient list and recreate the mailing
>list thereafter. But since we don't know what causes this behaviour, I
>can't be sure that my backups inclu
* Stefan Foerster :
> I fear I've got a decision to make here: To "fix" that problem, I'd
> normally simply export the recipient list and recreate the mailing list
> thereafter.
Is this guaranteed to help?
Have you tried this?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Ch
* Mark Sapiro :
> Does this delay occur uniformly over the entire list, or only within
> some group of recipients?
It occurs for all recipients, more or less - sometimes, it gets about
5 recipients done per second, but that's still far too slow.
> You could try running OutgoingRunner with Python'
On 2/20/2010 10:27 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>
> Yes. From debuglevel(1) logs:
>
> Feb 20 19:03:15 2010 qrunner(7551): send: 'rcpt
> TO:\r\n'
> Feb 20 19:03:15 2010 qrunner(7551): reply: '250 2.1.5 Ok\r\n'
> Feb 20 19:03:15 2010 qrunner(7551): reply: retcode (250); Msg: 2.1.5 Ok
> Feb 20
* Mark Sapiro :
> On 2/20/2010 4:21 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
> So, without VERP or personalization, you should be seeing SMTP
> transactions that look like
>
> HELO
> response
> MAIL FROM
> response
> RCPT TO
> response
> (repeated for up to SMTP_MAX_RCPTS recipients)
> DATA
> response
>
On 2/20/2010 4:21 AM, Stefan Foerster wrote:
>
> For all other lists on this server, the conversation between Postfix
> and Mailman is very fast paced, but for that one list, it takes almost
> one second for a recipient to be specified (which is then acknowledged
> immediately by Postfix).
So, w
Hello world,
I have a very strange performance problem which only affects one small
announce-only list with approximately 11000 recipients: The smtp
logfile shows that it takes Mailman about 8400 seconds to deliver the
mails, which just doesn't make sense.
Setup: Mailman is configured to deliver
Peet Grobler wrote:
>What exactly does the message in the subject mean? This is for messages
>delivered via SMTPDirect to local users on the machine itself. I don't
>see any remote addresses in smtp-failure for this domain.
This message comes from the Python smtplib module and it means smtplib
What exactly does the message in the subject mean? This is for messages
delivered via SMTPDirect to local users on the machine itself. I don't
see any remote addresses in smtp-failure for this domain.
Also - my out/ queue keeps filling up at times. I'm not sure if this is
related. I'm using ex
Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>But a later set show gave always delivery off.
>
>
>I still don't understand the problem.
>Mailman tried to send a response to my (ISP) MTA and failed?
Maybe these are related. What are the bounce settings for the list?
Does disable occur on the first bounce? Berhaps the
Mark Sapiro ha scritto:
> Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>> But I do this later, without effects.
>
>
> Do you get any reply at all to your email?
>
Yes:
- Risultati:
Impostata opzione delivery
- Finito.
- Results:
delivery option set
- End.
But a later set show gave always delivery off.
Manlio Perillo wrote:
>But I do this later, without effects.
Do you get any reply at all to your email?
>Maybe I have to unsubscribe/subscribe?
Can you visit your options page on the web and set delivery on there?
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Fr
Mark Sapiro ha scritto:
> Manlio Perillo wrote:
>> As a response to the "set show" command, I obtain:
>>
>> delivery off (a causa degli errori il Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:21:46 -)
>> cause of errors on
>>
>>
>> I've tried to send a "delivery on" command, but this seems not to work.
>> Wh
Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>As a response to the "set show" command, I obtain:
>
>delivery off (a causa degli errori il Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:21:46 -)
> cause of errors on
>
>
>I've tried to send a "delivery on" command, but this seems not to work.
>What's the problem?
Did you include
Hi.
As a response to the "set show" command, I obtain:
delivery off (a causa degli errori il Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:21:46 -)
cause of errors on
I've tried to send a "delivery on" command, but this seems not to work.
What's the problem?
Only the administrator can fix this?
Than
Hal Huntley wrote:
>One mailman instance that I work with is running 2.1.2 on a linux
>2.4.20-20.9 kernel.
>
>Mail to a specific list is not getting delivered, but other lists on the
>same instance are being delivered fine.
>
>Is there a command or a set of procedures that I can run to make the
One mailman instance that I work with is running 2.1.2 on a linux
2.4.20-20.9 kernel.
Mail to a specific list is not getting delivered, but other lists on the
same instance are being delivered fine. The error message one person got
back when they tried to send a message to the list was:
sta
Jeff Donsbach wrote:
>Has anyone out there had any problems with their lists where messages
>were not being delivered to subscribers on Prodigy?
My prodigy users receive list posts OK.
>I have one user
>on Prodigy (small lists) that says he hasn't received any list emails
>for a while now. I c
Has anyone out there had any problems with their lists where messages
were not being delivered to subscribers on Prodigy? I have one user
on Prodigy (small lists) that says he hasn't received any list emails
for a while now. I checked my Postfix logs and I can see that Prodigy
accepted the message
At 12:56 AM -0500 2005-12-29, Jason (WeatherServer) wrote:
> Anyone know the best numbers to have in Delivery Rates in PostFix for
> mailman lists?
Postfix doesn't do that sort of thing. Moreover, if postfix did
do that sort of thing, then you should be asking that question on a
post
Anyone know the best numbers to have in Delivery Rates in PostFix for
mailman lists?
Or is there a better server to use with mailman then postfix
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
Hi,
Can anyone point me in the direction of a good troubleshooting guide for pin
pointing problems with mailman? Specifically, it not delivering to a single
subscribed user?
We run about 55 sperate lists, they're all working perfectly, except for one
subscriber who doesn't get anything delivered
On Saturday, November 8, 2003, at 12:03 am, John Poltorak wrote:
Can anyone explain the difference betweem SMTPDirect and Sendmail ?
SMTPDirect is generic and will work with any SMTP compliant MTA for
handling outgoing messages. As a consequence, the MTA does not have to
reside on the same ma
Can anyone explain the difference betweem SMTPDirect and Sendmail ?
If I select Sendmail will outgoing mail be held in Sendmail spool queue?
--
John
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
Is there an option to send outgoing mail via Sendmail?
--
John
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
Hi!
I have 2 problems:
1. "Questions? Contact the Mailman site administrator at
mailman-owner@@FQDN@."
It's a wrong configuration... How can I change thos "@FQDN@"
with actual fully qualified domain name to the existing list?
2. I'm running a list for 600 subscribers and I get the following
er
Upgrade to Mailman 2.0.13
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-user
sometimes a message in the qfiles dir hangs the system.
this is the log
Oct 07 12:55:31 2002 qrunner(20485): Traceback (innermost last):
Oct 07 12:55:31 2002 qrunner(20485): File
"/usr/local/mailman/cron/qrunner", line 283, in ?
Oct 07 12:55:31 2002 qrunner(20485): kids = main(lock)
Oct 07
Does anyone have an idea what would cause these errore:
Aug 27 16:25:14 2002 (13774) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code 451:
Temporary local problem - please try later
Aug 27 16:25:14 2002 (13774) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code 451:
Temporary local problem - please
Mailman-2.1b3 running on RH 7.2
I have "DELIVERY ERROR:" and " MAILER-DEAMON" messages going to the
entire list.
I assume there is a way to only send these to the mailowner. The bounces
are easy to fix but the the Error messages shouldn't go to the list.
The other problem is The clients that
I want to set up a mailman list as a delivery-only list. I want to be
able to send, but I don't want recipients to be able to respond.
Is that possible?
--
Todd Petersen
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/m
Hi list,
We've recently moved our list to mailman. Unfortunately some addresses
on the list fail, but mailman tries to send it anyway every 5 minutes
resulting in a mail from postfix to the postmaster each 5 minutes for
one week, totalling 2016 mails per failed address per mail to the
list.
Of c
Hi
I need help because have this problem:
Error Log showed this:
Feb 22 15:00:09 2002 (5582) Delivery exception: EOF read where object expected
Feb 22 15:00:09 2002 (5582) Traceback (innermost last):
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/HandlerAPI.py", line 82, in
do_pipeline
Monday, February 25, 2002 12:40 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Delivery exception on Mailman
> Hi
>
> I need a help for anybody because have this problem :
>
> Error Log showed this:
>
> Delivery exception: EOF read where object expected
> Traceback (innermost last):
Hi
I need a help for anybody because have this problem :
Error Log showed this:
Delivery exception: EOF read where object expected
Traceback (innermost last):
File: "./usrlib/mailman/Mailman/handlers/Hold.py", line 177, in process
File: "./usrlib/mailman/Mailman/handlers/Ho
I need help for run the mailman. The error:
" Delivery exception: EOF read where object expected
traceback (innermost last):
File: "./usrlib/mailman/Mailman/handlers/Hold.py", line 177, in
process
File: "./usrlib/mailman/Mailman/handlers/Hold.py", line 218, in in
well here it goes,
poseidon.sitedomain.com is hosting (www.)debate.umcp.org
there are two mailing lists, "team" and "announce"
the web side of the hosting works fine.
mail send to those lists does not bounce
any mail sent by those lists (or by mailman itself) does not get sent,
mail is just s
On Fri, 4 May 2001 14:19:25 -0700
Ondercin Paul-O wrote:
>Is there a way to tell mailman to send a seperate email to each
> recipient? (Yes, I know this means more processor load).
MAX_RCPT_TO in mm_cfg.py
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-(
y
not the real answer to my problem, but the Max Recipeints is the real
answer! These are all documented in Defaults.py.
You're welcome, Paul!
-Paul :>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ondercin Paul-O10322
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
know this means more processor load).
Thanks in advance!
-Paul Ondercin
> -Original Message-
> From: Ondercin Paul-O10322
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mailman-Users] Delivery Problems
>
>
> Hello, all,
>
>I&
Hello, all,
I've gotten mailman working with some test lists on my Linux server,
and all of my tests worked great. Then I created a real list and added
~130 subscribers to it, and now it looks like some(I haven't counted
exactly what percentage) of the subscribers never get mailed, including
t
84 matches
Mail list logo
