Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
>the list is under /archives/public/* yet the archives are set to be private
>in the interface. not quite sure if that plays into anything, yet I would
>think not.
Each of your posts contains an additional clue that you are not looking
at the correct archive.
In general, al
On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> >
> >On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> cat archives/private//index.html
> >>
> >> is there an entry for June 2006?
> >>
> >
> >
> >Actually there is not. which seems odd since the arch script te
Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
>On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> cat archives/private//index.html
>>
>> is there an entry for June 2006?
>>
>
>
>Actually there is not. which seems odd since the arch script tells me that
>> it is creating the html.
>>
>
>
>If you do
>>
>> ls -l archi
On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> >
> >yet when i did the upgrade I copied all of the archives and placed them
> in
> >the proper spot. all other lists archive their posts correctly.
> >suggestions as to how to proceed or where to look? do I need to check
Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
>yet when i did the upgrade I copied all of the archives and placed them in
>the proper spot. all other lists archive their posts correctly.
>suggestions as to how to proceed or where to look? do I need to check the
>.mbox for the improper MIME structure? any help is appreci
yet when i did the upgrade I copied all of the archives and placed them in
the proper spot. all other lists archive their posts correctly.
suggestions as to how to proceed or where to look? do I need to check the
.mbox for the improper MIME structure? any help is appreciated.
Thank you,
Jeff D
Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
>the june
>directory exists yet on the interface nothing shows.
This is most likely due to old pages being cached in your web browser
or a proxy somewhere, or possibly you have two separate archives - a
pre upgrade archive at one location and a post upgrade archive at
another
Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
>and there are no entries in the shunt queue. here is the error log entry
>
> File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/__init__.py", line 51, in
>message_from_string
>return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s)
> File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/Parser.py",
and there are no entries in the shunt queue. here is the error log entry
File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/__init__.py", line 51, in
message_from_string
return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s)
File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr
re
yes they are in the .mbox and when I run arch it says that it is reworking
the html for the messages. initially, i had to run arch to get the messages
from the digest.mbox to have them placed in the list.mbox. the june
directory exists yet on the interface nothing shows.
On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>Are the June messages in archives/private/.mbox/.mbox?
If not, are there errors reported in Mailman's error log and shunted
messages in the 'shunt' queue.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use
Jeff DeReus wrote:
>i have recently upgraded to version 2.1.8. messages are not being archived
>for the month of june. archiving options are set properly in the
>interface. the archive.mbox is there but when i run the arch script, it
>says that the html is being formatted but still no entry for
i have recently upgraded to version 2.1.8. messages are not being archived
for the month of june. archiving options are set properly in the
interface. the archive.mbox is there but when i run the arch script, it
says that the html is being formatted but still no entry for june is
visible. the m
13 matches
Mail list logo
