Re: [Mailman-Users] bin/mailmanctl start

2003-06-20 Thread Daniel Buchmann
BAD MSG: In-Reply-To=67CADB90-915B-11D7-AF91-000393C78A8C%40soceco.uci.edu&Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMailman-Users%5D%20bin%2Fmailmanctl%20star : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2-3mdk Date: 20 Jun

Re: [Mailman-Users] bin/mailmanctl start

2003-05-29 Thread Jon Carnes
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 20:16, Vince LaMonica wrote: > Actually, I also did a 9.1 from scratch. I had 8.2, backed up all my > important data, and did an 'install' of 9.1, repartitioning my drives > at the same time. I also avoid doing 'upgrade' installs for the very > same reason [oddities creep

Re: [Mailman-Users] bin/mailmanctl start

2003-05-29 Thread Vince LaMonica
On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 03:45 PM, Jon Carnes wrote: Cool. The difference between our installs seems to be that I installed MDK9.1 from scratch. I keep a separate /home partition to let me do that easily - as I don't like the bugs that sometimes creep in via upgrades. Actually, I also did

Re: [Mailman-Users] bin/mailmanctl start

2003-05-29 Thread Jon Carnes
Cool. The difference between our installs seems to be that I installed MDK9.1 from scratch. I keep a separate /home partition to let me do that easily - as I don't like the bugs that sometimes creep in via upgrades. Glad to hear you got it going. Installing Python from source makes plenty of se

Re: [Mailman-Users] bin/mailmanctl start

2003-05-29 Thread Vince LaMonica
On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 09:05 AM, Jon Carnes wrote: Try installing every rpm from your distribution that has "python" in it. For Mandrake 9.1 I posted a message last month that pointed to all the rpm's that needed to be loaded. Mdk 9.0 probably has similar requirements. FWIW, I had the same