jon> Interesting. That wouldn't be too hard to write up... For my
jon> purposes I just toss anything that gets held and I like that
jon> setup, but I can see your point.
Well, if "just toss everything" means cranking through the web
interface and clicking "discard" for each, that's the same amo
Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] auto-rejecting non-subscriber posts
> I agree with you on stopping spam prior to reaching the list(s), but some
> times it takes a long time before
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:23 PM
> Subject: [Mailman-Users] auto-rejecting non-subscriber posts
>
> > [[This is so irritating (after a while) that I can't believe it's not
> > a more popular gripe.
ebruary 12, 2002 1:23 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] auto-rejecting non-subscriber posts
> [[This is so irritating (after a while) that I can't believe it's not
> a more popular gripe. Feel free to rub my nose in the obvious
> solution.]]
>
> I help run a very low volume mailing li
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, WJCarpenter wrote:
> [[This is so irritating (after a while) that I can't believe it's not
> a more popular gripe. Feel free to rub my nose in the obvious
> solution.]]
>
> I help run a very low volume mailing list. Most days, there are no
> postings. Sometimes weeks can g
[[This is so irritating (after a while) that I can't believe it's not
a more popular gripe. Feel free to rub my nose in the obvious
solution.]]
I help run a very low volume mailing list. Most days, there are no
postings. Sometimes weeks can go by with no postings. Every day,
though, we get lo
