Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 11/01/12 00:05, Mark Sapiro wrote: > If you want to scrub attachments only from 'large' messages, this > feature won't do it. You would need to do something such as creating a > custom handler (see ) that would invoke > the scrubber process only on large messages an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > >Oops wait a minute it seems there is something not working as expected. >Actually the message size not exceed the list size limit, but still >Mailman scrubbed by the attachment. >Where am I wrong? If you set scrub_nondigest to Yes, all attachments will be scrubbed

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 10/01/12 23:19, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > Wow it work fine! > I don't even need to approve, the message passed through to the list > with attachment link listed for every single attachment. Oops wait a minute it seems there is something not working as expected. Actually the message size

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 10/01/12 16:02, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: >> > No, not without changes. At least not if the held message is not >> > approved. >> > If what you want is for max_message_size to apply to the message as >> > received before scrubbing, then that is what you will get without >> > making changes to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-10 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On 01/10/2012 12:25 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> just need to confirm, if I set list restriction to 1024 KB (for example) >> will MailMan scrub the attachment (and making attachment linking, URL >> link) if the posting exceed 1024 KB? > > > No, not without changes. At least not if the held message i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-09 Thread Mark Sapiro
Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > >I have read the archive > >http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg58949.html > > >> i wan to know if there is a way to "detach" the attachment, place the >> file on a public web server and provide a link into the message to >> download the file from

[Mailman-Users] Attachment handling

2012-01-09 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hi there, I have read the archive http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg58949.html > i wan to know if there is a way to "detach" the attachment, place the > file on a public web server and provide a link into the message to > download the file from the webserver. In the

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachment handling

2011-04-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 4/4/2011 7:33 AM, Carlos R. Pasqualini wrote: > > i wan to know if there is a way to "detach" the attachment, place the > file on a public web server and provide a link into the message to > download the file from the webserver. In the list's web admin interface Non-digest options Section, se

[Mailman-Users] attachment handling

2011-04-04 Thread Carlos R. Pasqualini
Hi list i'm having trouble with attachments, because my users want to send mails with them and i don't want them to, so i've restricted the message size to 40kb. i wan to know if there is a way to "detach" the attachment, place the file on a public web server and provide a link into the message

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachment Handling

2005-03-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Roy McMorran wrote >Just built and now testing Mailman 2.1.5. It appears that Mailman >removes attachments from digests, and puts a link to the archived >attachment in its place with the notation "A non-text attachment was >scrubbed...". But can I get the same behavior for non-digested messa

[Mailman-Users] Attachment Handling

2005-03-17 Thread Roy McMorran
Just built and now testing Mailman 2.1.5. It appears that Mailman removes attachments from digests, and puts a link to the archived attachment in its place with the notation "A non-text attachment was scrubbed...". But can I get the same behavior for non-digested messages? Thanks, -- Roy McM

[Mailman-Users] Attachment Handling in Archives

2001-12-18 Thread Scott Armstrong
I want to thank the developers for such a top notch open source product. There are obviously areas that could be improved and I gather from what I've read that 2.1 has many new features. I realize that this code is targetted at handling pipermail archives, but it would be nice if private.py would