Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
>
>Where exactly are saved the atatchement files, also in which format uencoded
>or just like the original attachement file?
Scrubbed attachments are stored in the directory
archives/private//attachments. In most cases, they are just
the original attachment (decoded from th
hi!
Where exactly are saved the atatchement files, also in which format uencoded
or just like the original attachement file?
thank you in advance!
> At 3:04 PM -0300 2005-09-27, Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
>
>> My question is, how long are these files saved for people to download
>
> They a
At 2:29 PM +0900 2005-09-29, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Brad>Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely
> Brad> to collide.
>
> Can we stop pandering to the broken mailers, please? Are we not
> hackers? We know how to handle collisions.
I don't really care
> "John" == John W Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be
John> filtered, if used as is, for URL-unfriendly characters
I don't think so. AFAIK, that was fixed about 2000 RFCs ago. When
used as URLs, conforming agents will URL-enc
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brad> At 2:03 PM +0900 2005-09-28, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
Brad> Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely
Brad> to collide.
Can we sto
At 8:50 AM -0700 2005-09-28, John W. Baxter wrote:
> The hash of Message-Id:, Date:, and Received: (all of the Received: headers)
> would do, except for the case of an insane MTA--the one generating the "top"
> Received: header--feeding the same message into Mailman multiple times.
> Perhaps a
On 9/28/05 1:30 AM, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
>
> Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely to
> collide.
In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be filtered, if used as is,
for URL-unfriendly
At 2:03 PM +0900 2005-09-28, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely to
collide. For some time now, I've been arguing that they should use a
hash of the relevant information (mayb
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Im assuming they self delete after a while because clicking on
>> one of the link now indicates its not there."
Brad> That implies that something else is going on. There
Brad> is no standard cron job that I know of
At 3:04 PM -0300 2005-09-27, Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
> My question is, how long are these files saved for people to download
They are saved until some other process comes along to clean them out.
>and
> are they aut
Hi,
Wondering if someone know the answer of this, made for one of our clients...
"With the mailman software for mailing lists, it has the option of scrubbing
attatchments to the list and converts them to a link for people who are on the
list to click on to get the attatchment rather than every
11 matches
Mail list logo
