Re: [Mailman-Users] archtoc and archtocnombox

2019-04-24 Thread Mark Dale
> On 4/24/19 3:15 PM, Mark Dale wrote: >> Small archives seem to use "archtoc.html" which has the link to download >> the full raw archive (mbox). >> >> Larger lists appear to use "archtocnombox.html" which is minus the link. >> >> Is there a threshold (filesize) somewhere that determines which

Re: [Mailman-Users] archtoc and archtocnombox

2019-04-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 4/24/19 3:15 PM, Mark Dale wrote: > Hi All, > > Small archives seem to use "archtoc.html" which has the link to download > the full raw archive (mbox). > > Larger lists appear to use "archtocnombox.html" which is minus the link. > > Is there a threshold (filesize) somewhere that determines wh

[Mailman-Users] archtoc and archtocnombox

2019-04-24 Thread Mark Dale
Hi All, Small archives seem to use "archtoc.html" which has the link to download the full raw archive (mbox). Larger lists appear to use "archtocnombox.html" which is minus the link. Is there a threshold (filesize) somewhere that determines which gets used? or am I barking up the wrong tree comp