On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:41:49PM -0800, Tom Perrine wrote:
> I guess what I'm getting at is that the "arch" program uses LOTS of
> memory when building some of the indexes, and that incremental
> "arch"-ing may be more efficient and less likely to exercise
> memory-related bugs in Mailman, Pytho
The machine must have crashed just as a new message was being added,
so the pipermail.pck file was corrupt. The fix is to move the old
~malman/archives/public/listname directory out of the way completely
and rerun ~mailman/bin/arch on the list, which I've done, and all is
good.
On Sun, 06 Jan 2
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:12:27 -0800, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Micah> The archives of a particular list went astray, so I tried to run arch
Micah> to re-pickle them, it went for some time (we have archives for a
Micah> couple years), up until December of this year,
The archives of a particular list went astray, so I tried to run arch
to re-pickle them, it went for some time (we have archives for a
couple years), up until December of this year, then it puked, anyone
know how to fix this??
2001-December
Traceback (innermost last):
File "./arch", line 129, i
