Re: [Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Putnam wrote: > >Correct, that was not the case. However, a co-moderator made a change >using the config script (not sure what) and that worked. Thanks. There is no difference between changing a setting via config_list and changing it via the web admin interface. Are you sure the failing

Re: [Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-22 Thread Dennis Putnam
Correct, that was not the case. However, a co-moderator made a change using the config script (not sure what) and that worked. Thanks. On 9/22/2012 3:53 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Dennis Putnam wrote: >> That didn't seem to change anything. Since I did it via the web admin >> page do I need to resta

Re: [Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Putnam wrote: > >That didn't seem to change anything. Since I did it via the web admin >page do I need to restart mailman or run withlist? No. >My current settings are: > >Hide sender: no >Reply-to header stripped: yes >Replies to list messages: this list And that should result in post

Re: [Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-22 Thread Dennis Putnam
That didn't seem to change anything. Since I did it via the web admin page do I need to restart mailman or run withlist? My current settings are: Hide sender: no Reply-to header stripped: yes Replies to list messages: this list On 9/21/2012 8:39 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Dennis Putnam wrote; >>

Re: [Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-22 Thread Dennis Putnam
I'll try it. Thanks. On 9/21/2012 8:39 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Dennis Putnam wrote; >> I'm a little confused by the option to hide the sender of a message. I >> THINK if I leave this as yes, then users will wind up sending replies to >> the sender rather than the list (that is the way this list w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-21 Thread Mark Sapiro
Dennis Putnam wrote; > >I'm a little confused by the option to hide the sender of a message. I >THINK if I leave this as yes, then users will wind up sending replies to >the sender rather than the list (that is the way this list works much to >my chagrin but I understand the reasons) unless they re

[Mailman-Users] Anonymous Posting

2012-09-21 Thread Dennis Putnam
I'm a little confused by the option to hide the sender of a message. I THINK if I leave this as yes, then users will wind up sending replies to the sender rather than the list (that is the way this list works much to my chagrin but I understand the reasons) unless they remember to change the To: fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] anonymous posting

2004-09-03 Thread Brad Knowles
At 6:39 PM -0700 2004-09-02, Jeff Pflueger wrote: with [EMAIL PROTECTED] being whoever posted to the list. Anyway to disable this and make it completely anonymous? You have to have something there, in order for the mail message to be legal. Therefore, one particular anonymous string is not re

[Mailman-Users] anonymous posting

2004-09-02 Thread Jeff Pflueger
if anonymous list is checked as 'yes' the subject line seems to be: "[list name] from [EMAIL PROTECTED]" with [EMAIL PROTECTED] being whoever posted to the list. Anyway to disable this and make it completely anonymous? Thanks! Jeff -- Mailman-User

[Mailman-Users] anonymous posting and web posting to Mailman

2002-12-09 Thread Elaine Miller
This thread came up a while back, and I said I'd trundle off and play with the idea. I've got it working now, in the simplest way I could think, with the latest version of Formmail. In short, posting can be done from within an .htaccess protected directory, and the user can type in their own s