Mark T. Valites wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Why not either add her as a member with delivery off or add her to the
>> filter of non-members allowed to post?
>
>I try to stay out of the visible path of my list moderators. While I'm
>sure most of them would be receptive to t
On Aug 26, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Mark T. Valites wrote:
The department that is responsible for the list is leary of making all
the
members of the list digest members, in case an important message needs
to
be sent immeadiately. Even though we have a non-digested emergency
"911"
list synchronized wit
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Why not either add her as a member with delivery off or add her to the
> filter of non-members allowed to post?
I try to stay out of the visible path of my list moderators. While I'm
sure most of them would be receptive to the change, I'm sure some would
Mark T. Valites wrote:
>...
>
>The head of our department periodically sends out email to mailing lists
>for each of our residence halls on campus. All the lists are set up to
>hold messages from non-list members. Not being a list member, she can't
>tell if/when the message has been approved. Is th
The items below have come up lately as things we'd like to be able to do
with our mailman setup. I'm open to any alternative suggestions, hacks or
comments...
One of my biggest mailman lists is used to broadcast messages to our
entire student body. The list contains approximately ~5500 non-digest
hola Roberto:
soy maria porres de sevilla.¿?te acuerdas de mi¿?
contestame por favor.para saber quien soy y verme visita mi pagina
web:www.mariaporres.com
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mai
At 08:58 04/06/2003, Richard Barrett wrote:
At 08:17 04/06/2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:05:44PM +0100, Richard Barrett wrote:
> At 16:25 03/06/2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think you will also find some versio
At 08:17 04/06/2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:05:44PM +0100, Richard Barrett wrote:
> At 16:25 03/06/2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think you will also find some versions of MS Outlook display this
> conflation of
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:05:44PM +0100, Richard Barrett wrote:
> At 16:25 03/06/2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I think you will also find some versions of MS Outlook display this
> conflation of several headers in the "From" field of t
At 16:25 03/06/2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Mailman is great, mailman is good, all hail mailman :)
I have to administer a mailing list for which a special requirement was
requested:
It will be a moderated list where only special people might be able to
send mails through. All these
Hi!
Mailman is great, mailman is good, all hail mailman :)
I have to administer a mailing list for which a special requirement was
requested:
It will be a moderated list where only special people might be able to
send mails through. All these mails should have the same From: header,
At 23:20 09/12/2002, Jeff Stern wrote:
hi, i didn´t see this on http://mailman.sourceforge.net/todo.html but it
would be nice if, with mailman´s archives pages (whether organized by
thread, subject, or author, or date) the user were not limited to
searching by month only.
for instance, on the
* Jeff Stern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hi, i didn´t see this on http://mailman.sourceforge.net/todo.html but it
> would be nice if, with mailman´s archives pages (whether organized by
> thread, subject, or author, or date) the user were not limited to
> searching by month only.
You have cont
hi, i didn´t see this on http://mailman.sourceforge.net/todo.html but it
would be nice if, with mailman´s archives pages (whether organized by
thread, subject, or author, or date) the user were not limited to
searching by month only.
for instance, on the mailman-based mailing list, ¨gimp-user¨,
On 8/14/02 12:55 PM, "John W Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never use those "forward to a friend" (or soon to be former friend)
> things, and cringe when friends aim them at me. I'm too lazy to look into
> privacy policies deeply enough to know what's going to happen to the
> addresses a
At 8:17 -0700 8/13/2002, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:
>On 8/13/02 1:29 AM, "Nigel Metheringham"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So "Wile E Spammer" of "Evil Spammers Incorporated" writes a little
>> script that does an invite subscribe of a few hundred throusand of his
>> "friends" with an invitation
On 8/13/02 1:29 AM, "Nigel Metheringham"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So "Wile E Spammer" of "Evil Spammers Incorporated" writes a little
> script that does an invite subscribe of a few hundred throusand of his
> "friends" with an invitation note of whatever crap he is sending out
> this week.
>
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 18:34:12 -0400
Rajesh Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last of all I have a general question which I do not see addressed in
> the FAQ - how is a request like this handled and is there any feedback
> so I can tell if this request is going anywhere anytime soon?
This is Open
Wooh,
hey, yeah, sounds wonderful.. just tell me one thing..
Who's gonna be held responsible?
heh
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 03:29 am, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 23:57, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
> > Very, very good idea, actually. I certainly know my friends and coworkers
>
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 23:57, G. Armour Van Horn wrote:
> Very, very good idea, actually. I certainly know my friends and coworkers well
> enough that I wouldn't sign them up for somthing that they wouldn't enjoy or
> benefit from. To join relative strangers to the list is obviously a bad idea. But
Dear Sir
I hope this is going to the right place. I would
like to request the following two features:
(1) On subscription, the email sent out requires
the user to ACTIVATE the mailing request before they actually get added to the
list. This is to address an issue where people are sometime
On 8/12/02 3:57 PM, "G. Armour Van Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But
> if the confirmation message included a note *from me*, whom they know, and
> then
> offered them the chance to ignore the message and not subscribe, or to reply
> to be
> subscribed, this would be a good process.
No, ba
Tom Whiting wrote:
> > (2) A feature that allows a user to register someone else (a friend) with
> > an Introduction ADDED to the subscription email that is sent. So I could
> > subscribe a friend and add a personal messge so they know I sent this to
> > them ...
> VERY VERY not good idea (though
> "RP" == Rajesh Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RP> Last of all I have a general question which I do not see
RP> addressed in the FAQ - how is a request like this handled and
RP> is there any feedback so I can tell if this request is going
RP> anywhere anytime soon?
Mailm
> (1) On subscription, the email sent out requires the user to ACTIVATE the
> mailing request before they actually get added to the list. This is to
> address an issue where people are sometimes registered without their
> consent!
If you'll go into the mailing list options, I believe there is a se
Kind request: Do not post in HTML.
--
Rajesh Patel wrote:
> (1) On subscription, the email sent out requires the user to ACTIVATE the
> mailing request before they actually get added to the list. This is to
> address an issue where people are sometimes registered without their cons
> "AB" == Aaron Birenboim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AB> How hard would it be to add this URL to the response to the
AB> "help" e-mail command?
You know, that's a dang good suggestion, and not at all difficult to
add. It's now part of MM2.1.
Thanks!
-Barry
-
At this time, you need to know that the ONLY place to go to get
a reminder of your password is:
http://mydomain.com/mailman/options/myList/myName%40myISP.com
This is a bit obscure.
How hard would it be to add this URL
to the response to the "help" e-mail command?
How could I get this in t
> "PC" == Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PC> Could it become possible for users authenticated with a cookie
PC> to post to the mailing list using some sort of Web-based
PC> interface, with a CGI script generating the actual mail?
PC> With this done, could Pipermail
On 26 Oct 2001 13:15:49 +0100
Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This is what I've done at Kanga.Nu using PHP and MHonArc atop
>> Mailman. See the list archives here (or -developers) to get the
>> various RCs and how to install.
>>
>> http://w
J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Could it become possible for users authenticated with a cookie to
> > post to the mailing list using some sort of Web-based interface,
> > with a CGI script generating the actual mail?
>
> This is what I've done at Kanga.Nu using PHP and MHonArc atop
>
content, and click on send when you are done.
Go for it!
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:51 AM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Wishlist: Posting to the list from the Web pages
> Could it
On 26 Oct 2001 10:51:26 +0100
Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could it become possible for users authenticated with a cookie to
> post to the mailing list using some sort of Web-based interface,
> with a CGI script generating the actual mail?
This is what I've done at Kanga.Nu using P
Could it become possible for users authenticated with a cookie to post
to the mailing list using some sort of Web-based interface, with a CGI
script generating the actual mail?
With this done, could Pipermail be enhanced so you can "follow up" a
message in the archives using a Web-based interface
Hallo,
I wish that mailman 3.0 can send out digest in varius granuality.
Not only 1 per day, also 1 per week (or other rates).
I know that it is only feasibly to add a fixed number of options.
For the addition of 1 per week digest the system must generate
every day not only the digest of the day,
On Feb 16, 2001 at 10:31, David Miner wrote:
>I use mailman to manage about 20 lists. I only have two (really one) wish.
> In both add_members and remove_members have an option to search ALL lists
>and remove the individual from them, rather than one at a time.
How about a script that will run
I use mailman to manage about 20 lists. I only have two (really one) wish.
In both add_members and remove_members have an option to search ALL lists
and remove the individual from them, rather than one at a time.
Thanks for all of your hard work. It has eased mine greatly. Now I can
let other
37 matches
Mail list logo
