Re: [Mailman-Users] "We hit a bug" page

2009-07-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Remco Poelstra wrote: >General note: Maybe it would be nice if Mailman would not say `We hit a >bug`, since that´s not really correct, but say more something like >´permission error´. This page is produced for any uncaught exception encountered by any of the web CGI scripts. The intent is to p

Re: [Mailman-Users] "We hit a bug" page

2009-07-22 Thread Remco Poelstra
Mark Sapiro schreef: > This won't work. Your Mailman group is 'list'. With suEXEC, your wrappers cannot be SETGID, thus Apache must invoke them as group 'list' and this must also be the group that the wrappers expect to be invoked as. I.e. --with-cgi-gid=list If you want to actually create and

Re: [Mailman-Users] "We hit a bug" page

2009-07-21 Thread Mark Sapiro
Remco Poelstra wrote: > >I'm trying to install Mailman 2.1.12. It compiled fine, with the >following flags: > ./configure --prefix=/var/lib/mailman --with-username=list \ > --with-groupname=list \ > --with-mail-gid=daemon --with-cgi-gid=w-lists \ This won'

[Mailman-Users] "We hit a bug" page

2009-07-21 Thread Remco Poelstra
Hi, I'm trying to install Mailman 2.1.12. It compiled fine, with the following flags: ./configure --prefix=/var/lib/mailman --with-username=list \ --with-groupname=list \ --with-mail-gid=daemon --with-cgi-gid=w-lists \ --without-permcheck

[Mailman-Users] We Hit a Bug!

2001-02-09 Thread J . S . Harlim
We tried to run Archive (under Mailman V2.0Beta5) running on Red Hat Linux V7.0 with the following error message. I'd appreciate it very much if any one out there could shed some light on it. Many Thanks. Please see below for the error message. --- Jongky S. Harlim Computing Services, Heriot-W