Re: [Mailman-Users] uncaught bounce notification

Ted Frohling wrote: >I'm getting an uncaught bounce notification from a particular user on >one of my mailing lists. In a message in the archives, one respondent >said they could look at the message, but would need the original >email. I'm using mailman 2.1.9 and postfix as the mta. I can't fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] uncaught bounce notification

Ted Frohling wrote: >I'm getting an uncaught bounce notification from a particular user on >one of my mailing lists. In a message in the archives, one respondent >said they could look at the message, but would need the original >email. I'm using mailman 2.1.9 and postfix as the mta. I can't fig

[Mailman-Users] uncaught bounce notification

I'm getting an uncaught bounce notification from a particular user on one of my mailing lists. In a message in the archives, one respondent said they could look at the message, but would need the original email. I'm using mailman 2.1.9 and postfix as the mta. I can't figure out where I would fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Jeff Grossman wrote: >> >>Don't temporary failures get a score of 0.5 while a permanent failure >> gets >>a score of 1.0? So, if that is the case, these temporary failures would >>take longer to suspend the account. I think these should be counted. > > > That's what the docum

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

Jeff Grossman wrote: > >Don't temporary failures get a score of 0.5 while a permanent failure gets >a score of 1.0? So, if that is the case, these temporary failures would >take longer to suspend the account. I think these should be counted. That's what the documentation says, but in fact, it d

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

on 2/14/09 7:32 PM, Grant Taylor said: Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the bounce is speaking of is on the SMTP level, thus the sending server should not try to send this given message again. I think it is a flaw to extend this SMTP meaning up to actual futur

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

Grant Taylor wrote: > On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote: >> I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today. >> The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been >> caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did >> not get caught

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

On 02/14/2009 08:08 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: and I interpret that to mean that even though the user is over quota, the MTA will accept a < 1 KB message to allow you to try to notify the user of the problem, not that the user is 1 KB below quota. *nod* Hopefully there is a limit to how far over

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

Grant Taylor wrote: > >P.S. I find it interesting that the bounce is eluding to the amount of >space remaining in the account. This is (in my experience) extremely >unusual. As I read the bounce, it says Sorry, your intended recipient has too much mail stored in his mailbox. Your message tot

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

On 02/14/2009 07:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: That question hinges on whether or not the bounce should be considered a permanent or a temporary failure. The bounce itself says "This is a permanent error." Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the bounce is speaking of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

* Grant Taylor wrote: >On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote: >> I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today. >> The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been >> caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did >> not get c

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

Grant Taylor wrote: >On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote: >> I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today. >> The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been >> caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did >> not get caug

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

On 02/13/2009 07:29 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote: I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today. The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did not get caught by the bounce system? Though

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

Jeff Grossman wrote: >I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today. >The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been caught >by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did not get >caught by the bounce system? You send them to me, but I nee

[Mailman-Users] Uncaught Bounce Notification

I received a uncaught bounce notification from one of my lists today. The bounce looks pretty normal, and figured it should have been caught by the bounce system. How do I report bounce formats that did not get caught by the bounce system? Here is the bounce. I changed the e-mail address. An

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification: Why this message , I haven't sent Any mails

On Dec 17, 2007 11:20 AM, Barry Finkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have a problem here where mail from a Mailman list is sent to > a BlackBerry device. When the recipient does a "reply-all", one of > the reply recipients is the list -bounce address. This appears to be a > bug in the BlackB

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification: Why this message , I haven't sent Any mails

On 12/17/07, kk CHN wrote: > I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator > for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly > with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification In this case, someone sent out spam, claiming to b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification: Why this message , I haven't sent Any mails

kk CHN wrote: >> >>I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator >>for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly >>with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification >> >> >>I havn't sent any mails to the address ("[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification: Why this message , I haven't sent Any mails

kk CHN wrote: > >I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator >for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly >with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification > > >I havn't sent any mails to the address ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") >st

[Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification: Why this message , I haven't sent Any mails

Hello everybody ; I have few mailing lists running on Mailman(I am the list administrator for these lists ) : for the last few days I am getting a message regularly with subject line like this : Uncaught bounce notification I havn't sent any mails to the address ("[EMAIL PROTECTED] "

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification - Out-of-Office

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Barry Finkel wrote: > Are there plans for Mailman to be able to intercept out-of-office > replies and ignore them? Or is the format of the text too variable > to be able to parse the OOO message? I've solved this problem locally using a procmail rule, and I think the meth

[Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification - Out-of-Office

Barry Finkel writes: > The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce > format was not recognized, This is the relevant case here. If the message doesn't look like an MTA bounce, it's probably a bad idea to treat it as a bounce. ML admin addresses get a fair am

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification - Out-of-Office

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 08:12 -0500, Barry Finkel wrote: > Or is the format of the text too variable > to be able to parse the OOO message? Bingo! No Standard, and even if there was one most wouldn't follow it. The 2 biggest offenders I see are Outlook/Exchange and Lotus Notes, of which neither t

[Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification - Out-of-Office

I, as co-owner of a Mailman 2.1.9 list, received this message: Subject: Uncaught bounce notification The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted from it. This mailing list has been c

Re: [Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification loop

Brian Parish wrote: >With *bounce_processing set to Yes on one list I get: >* > >The attached message was received as a bounce... > >messages, with the same message attached many times. i.e. The Uncaught bounce >notification IS the attached message. These continue streaming out until I >turn o

[Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification loop

With *bounce_processing set to Yes on one list I get: * The attached message was received as a bounce... messages, with the same message attached many times. i.e. The Uncaught bounce notification IS the attached message. These continue streaming out until I turn off *bounce_processing Clues

Re: [Mailman-Users] "Uncaught bounce notification" question/problem

John Swartzentruber wrote: >When one user on one of my lists replies to list messages, they get sent >to the bounce address and show up as uncaught bounces. I understand why >this is happening, so that itself isn't my question. In the latest >instance, this user also CC'ed the correct list addr

[Mailman-Users] "Uncaught bounce notification" question/problem

When one user on one of my lists replies to list messages, they get sent to the bounce address and show up as uncaught bounces. I understand why this is happening, so that itself isn't my question. In the latest instance, this user also CC'ed the correct list address. It looks like the message

[Mailman-Users] Uncaught bounce notification

Whenever I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the message is bounced back to me with the subject: Uncaught bounce notification "The attached message was received as a bounce, but either the bounce format was not recognized, or no member addresses could be extracted from it. This mailing list has