Links at Momsview wrote:
I currently have a VERY large ( >100k) announce only list (always
moderated) running mailman 2.1 under Postfix.
For performance reasons I'm considering splitting this list into 26 sublists
based on the first letter of each subscriber email.
I would then use an umbrella
Richard,
Thank you very much for the detailed reply.
Please let me know if I understood what you are suggesting
(1) By having the sublists ONLY accept messages with a
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NO ONE can ever directly post to the sublists by directly sending an email
to my server since ANY email
of th
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:23:51 -0500
Links at Momsview <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion and the link. This is what I'm seeing with
> my single list of 140,000 subs
Urk, I've not played with 2.1 much at all yet (too buried in Zope). I'd
thought that 2.1 lost the in-memory dic
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Umbrella List Spam Protection
> Links at Momsview wrote:
> > I currently have a VERY large ( >100k) announce only list (always
> > moderated) running mailman 2.1 under Postfix.
> >
>
At 12:11 12/02/2003, Links at Momsview wrote:
I currently have a VERY large ( >100k) announce only list (always
moderated) running mailman 2.1 under Postfix.
For performance reasons I'm considering splitting this list into 26 sublists
based on the first letter of each subscriber email.
I would
> "LaM" == Links at Momsview <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LaM> I currently have a VERY large ( >100k) announce only list (always
LaM> moderated) running mailman 2.1 under Postfix.
It seems to me if you turn off personalization, turn off VERP, and
turn off anything else that would cause indi
I currently have a VERY large ( >100k) announce only list (always
moderated) running mailman 2.1 under Postfix.
For performance reasons I'm considering splitting this list into 26 sublists
based on the first letter of each subscriber email.
I would then use an umbrella list to send to all of the
