Re: [Mailman-Users] Tracebacks with 2.1.5 since upgrading to Python 2.4

2004-12-06 Thread Ben McGinnes
Bryan Fullerton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:58:26AM -0500: > > Do I need to do something with Mailman after updating to Python 2.4, > or is this a bug? Okay, I just did a couple of tests here and after doing a "mailmanctl restart" I no longer appear to be receiving those traceback

Re: [Mailman-Users] Tracebacks with 2.1.5 since upgrading to Python 2.4

2004-12-06 Thread Ben McGinnes
Bryan Fullerton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:58:26AM -0500: > > Do I need to do something with Mailman after updating to Python 2.4, > or is this a bug? Looks like I'm getting the same thing with Mailman 2.1.4 and Python 2.4, although the mail sent to the lists is reaching the appro

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] Tracebacks with 2.1.5 since upgrading to Python 2.4

2004-12-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 21:41, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,)*6)) should be something like: > time.strftime('%d-%b-%Y', day + (0,0,0,0,1,0)) > > Looks like we should care 2.4 compatibilty first before jumping in it. Definitely. We should not release 2.1.6 until we're

Re: [Mailman-Users] Tracebacks with 2.1.5 since upgrading to Python 2.4

2004-12-03 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Bryan Fullerton wrote: Howdy, I'm running Mailman 2.1.5 and upgraded to Python 2.4 yesterday. Since then I've gotten 9 tracebacks in the error log as below, with ~130 bounces processed during that time. I've never seen this error before with Mailman that I can remember. (snip) Dec 03 07:48:21 2004

[Mailman-Users] Tracebacks with 2.1.5 since upgrading to Python 2.4

2004-12-03 Thread Bryan Fullerton
Howdy, I'm running Mailman 2.1.5 and upgraded to Python 2.4 yesterday. Since then I've gotten 9 tracebacks in the error log as below, with ~130 bounces processed during that time. I've never seen this error before with Mailman that I can remember. Dec 03 07:48:21 2004 qrunner(47971): Traceback (m