> "EAM" == Eric A Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
EAM> So I'd been thinking that having a "collapsed" view would
EAM> help with that. On the other hand, if 2.1 will offer options
EAM> to default non-subscriber messages to "discard," as a recent
EAM> message implied 2.1 wou
> "AcLA" == AerosmithFanClub com List Admin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AcLA> Now thats about the stupidest statement I have ever
AcLA> seen! Mail that you dont see on the list does not get to
AcLA> the list. Same damn thing.
Dude, please chill. I think we can get
At 8:32 -0400 5/14/02, Robert Wilson wrote:
>I wonder if having an option to bounce the message with an error that
>looks like the address is invalid when the sender isn't subscribed to
>the list would help with spam attempts.
Hmmm, perhaps-- although my fear would be that the spambots would
half Of Eric A. Meyer
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] The moderation/SPAM queue
>
>
> At 16:49 -0600 5/13/02, Mike Avery wrote:
>
> >However, any list that has any real presence will be
> >subjected to any n
"AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin" wrote:
> Technically the other person is way anal.
Everyone has a right to be. I hear you screaming, doesn't mean I'm listening.
> So if I or my subscribers never GET it in our
> mailboxes then the list does not GET mail. You sendign something does not
>
At 16:49 -0600 5/13/02, Mike Avery wrote:
>However, any list that has any real presence will be
>subjected to any number of attacks. Once the email
>address is known, spammers will try to send to it.
Boy, isn't that the truth. Which reminds me, I was wondering if
there are any thoughts of
Technically the other person is way anal. The mail does not get to the
list until it is delivered to the subscribers. Until then it is in the
process of being sent. So if I or my subscribers never GET it in our
mailboxes then the list does not GET mail. You sendign something does not
mean
"AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin" wrote:
> Mail that you
> dont see on the list does not get to the list. Same damn thing.
>
> As long as it is blocked from the list then
> the list does not get the mail. I stand by what I said. If you set up
> your list correctly then the list will not get an
Now thats about the stupidest statement I have ever seen! Mail that you
dont see on the list does not get to the list. Same damn thing. What
people send is another issue. Folks can send what ever they want where
ever and when ever they want. As long as it is blocked from the list t
On 10 May 2002 at 17:48, AerosmithFanClub.com List
Adm wrote:
> A correctly configured list will get ZERO spam.
Not quite. A correctly configured list will see zero
spam.
However, any list that has any real presence will be
subjected to any number of attacks. Once the email
address is kno
"AerosmithFanClub.com List Admin" wrote:
>
> A correctly configured list will get ZERO spam.
yeah, and i'm santa claus.
get real, man. the more "correctly" you configure a list, the less
usable it becomes. there is a trade-off. don't sound off about things
you haven't really thought about.
-
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 15:04, Chuck Peters wrote:
> I am sure many of you are spending some time moderating lists where most
> of the moderation is SPAM. A couple lists ar getting more spam than
> legitimate traffic and its a real pain to clean this up via the web
> interface.
Chuck,
Marc Merlin
A correctly configured list will get ZERO spam.
At 06:04 PM 5/9/2002 -0400, Chuck Peters wrote:
>
>I am sure many of you are spending some time moderating lists where most
>of the moderation is SPAM. A couple lists ar getting more spam than
>legitimate traffic and its a real pain to clean th
I am sure many of you are spending some time moderating lists where most
of the moderation is SPAM. A couple lists ar getting more spam than
legitimate traffic and its a real pain to clean this up via the web
interface.
If their an effecient way to clean out this spam rather than scrolling
thro
14 matches
Mail list logo
