At 11:46 AM -0600 2005-09-22, Ivan Fetch wrote:
> i'm looking at this for our setup as well. How are others handling
> the Mailman processes (qrunners) starting on a second server once the
> first server has gone down, and switching back to the first server once
> it has recovered?
Hello,
i'm looking at this for our setup as well. How are others handling
the Mailman processes (qrunners) starting on a second server once the first
server has gone down, and switching back to the first server once it has
recovered?
Mailman's locks are usually not cleaned up properly
At 9:46 AM -0500 2005-09-22, Brian Elliott Finley wrote:
> I'm very interested in the solution you chose, and in how well it works
> for you.
Sorry, I missed the original message.
> I'm in the process of designing a fault-tolerant mailman installation,
> and any wisdom from experienc
Aaron,
I'm very interested in the solution you chose, and in how well it works
for you.
I'm in the process of designing a fault-tolerant mailman installation,
and any wisdom from experience would be very useful.
Thanks!
-Brian
IT Purchases wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Any thoughts on what is the be
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:04:21AM -0400, IT Purchases wrote:
> Any thoughts on what is the best way to synchronize mailman databases
> between to linux boxes?
> If my alias_maps are defined the same in /etc/postfix/main.cf are the
> same on both hosts can I just duplicate my /usr/lib/mailman and
>
Hello,
Any thoughts on what is the best way to synchronize mailman databases
between to linux boxes?
If my alias_maps are defined the same in /etc/postfix/main.cf are the
same on both hosts can I just duplicate my /usr/lib/mailman and
/var/lib/mailman directories?
Aaron
~
--
