On Friday, 13 February 2004 9:54 PM -0600, Paul Kleeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am currently using Mailman on Redhat 8.0 and to be honest it was a pain
for me to get that to work with the redHat version of htDig which as it
turns out was a beta version released as 3.2. I am not looking to
Paul Kleeberg wrote:
Well I downloaded Debian and installed it on a machine and then was
kind of stuck. I am not a Unix admin by trade and RH has enough GUI
tools (or at least I invested enough sweat into it that I learned just
what I needed to know - no more) that I am able to configure t
Paul Kleeberg wrote:
I am currently using Mailman on Redhat 8.0 and to be honest it was a
pain for me to get that to work with the redHat version of htDig which
as it turns out was a beta version released as 3.2. I am not looking to
start a religious war but am considering switching to MacOSX
On Feb 13, 2004, at 9:54 PM, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
Will be easier or more difficult to configure MM and htDig on the Mac
than RH. I run only a handful of lists that have 50 to 500 users.
I can't speak to RH, but I found Mailman and htDig to be fairly easy to
install from source and configure und
I am currently using Mailman on Redhat 8.0 and to be honest it was a
pain for me to get that to work with the redHat version of htDig which
as it turns out was a beta version released as 3.2. I am not looking
to start a religious war but am considering switching to MacOSX Server
from RedHat.
