On 04/17/2017 03:00 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> Summary:
> In eg http://mailman.berklix.org/mailman/admin/test/members/list
> next to column "mod" there would be a 2nd column eg "self discard".
> - "mod" would as before be set by admin to block & store for review.
Or reject or discard based o
Top posting is bad.
Failing to indent prior text with "> " is bad.
Corrected below:
Gretchen R Beck wrote:
> Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Hi mailman-users@python.org
> > Suggestion: Add a new binary flag: "Discard [or bounce] Posts From Sender
> > http://berklix.org/~jhs/help/majordomo/#discard_s
ian H. Stacey
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Suggestion: Add a new binary flag: "Discard [or
bounce] Sender Posts
Hi mailman-users@python.org
Suggestion: Add a new binary flag: "Discard [or bounce] Posts From Sender
http://berklix.org/~jhs/help/majordomo/#discard_sender
Reason: A mailman list
On 04/16/2017 04:27 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi mailman-users@python.org
> Suggestion: Add a new binary flag: "Discard [or bounce] Posts From Sender
How about setting the user to moderated and setting
member_moderation_action to discard?
If it's just this one (or a few) addresses, that mig
Hi mailman-users@python.org
Suggestion: Add a new binary flag: "Discard [or bounce] Posts From Sender
http://berklix.org/~jhs/help/majordomo/#discard_sender
Reason: A mailman list member got his address book harvested by a spammer,
twice spammed a mailman list I run, I removed list member, asked
David wrote:
>
>The following wording is very confusing (especially because of its
>similarity to the wording of the next item which has the opposite effect):
>
>Remove message attachments that don't have a matching content type. Leave
>> this field blank to skip this filter test.
>>
>
>I would lik
The following wording is very confusing (especially because of its
similarity to the wording of the next item which has the opposite effect):
Remove message attachments that don't have a matching content type. Leave
> this field blank to skip this filter test.
>
I would like to propose to the dev
Rick.French writes:
> Your software was suggested as a package that would assist the
> handling of the task. I did download it but it will not work with
> the windows s/w that I use as my op system.
There are many ISPs/hosting providers that offer Mailman as a service.
There is a good chance t
Good Afternoon
Your software was recommended as a solution for my requirements. I am a
Realtor and I would like to be able to send out mass emails to the folks
that have asked to be kept up-to-date. I have tried to send to my list once
but apparently it was viewed as spam and most of the mail c
Khalil Abbas wrote:
>
>I have a suggestion for you .. it's about importing and exporting the list's
>configuration using the web interface not just shell command using :
>'config_list'..
>
This and similar features - e.g. multiple list style templates and
possibly cloning lists will probably b
hello team..
I have a suggestion for you .. it's about importing and exporting the list's
configuration using the web interface not just shell command using :
'config_list'..
this will help those who have mailman with shared hosting plans and have no
access to server .. not only that,
Reasoning: those messages are not actually mailing list traffic. Yes,
they're related to the list, and they're about the list, but they're not
being sent through the list per se.
In addition, one of the things that I've noticed is that filtering/filing
based on List-Id (say, a procmail recipe) wi
At 8:59 AM -0800 12/6/06, Dragon wrote:
> Your old boss obviously has no realistic grasp of the subject.
Don't jump to conclusions too quickly. See my other message first.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trend Micro has announced that they will cancel the stop.mail-abuse.org
mail forwar
At 8:26 AM -0800 12/6/06, Jon Forrest wrote:
> Given that Mailman is written in Python, my naive impression
> would be that this should be relatively easy to implement.
> (As my old boss Mike Stonebraker used to say, it's just
> "a simple matter of software").
Unfortunately, there are people
At 10:39 AM -0600 12/6/06, Patrick Bogen wrote:
> The command-line config_list and/or with_list tools have a slightly
> higher up-front cost (in terms of work required), but trivialize the
> cost-per-list for config updates, for the purpose of applying a single
> value across multiple lists.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 6, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Dragon wrote:
> As far as I can discern from my limited perusing of source code, it
> would be a huge change in architecture.
This is true. While a more detailed discussion of this topic belongs
on the developers list,
Patrick Bogen sent the message below at 08:39 12/6/2006:
>On 12/6/06, Jon Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm relatively new to Mailman but I've managed
> > to build it from source and set up a few lists,
> > with generous help from this list.
> >
> > While working through issues relating to
On 12/6/06, Jon Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm relatively new to Mailman but I've managed
> to build it from source and set up a few lists,
> with generous help from this list.
>
> While working through issues relating to
> creating a standard list configuration, I started
> to feel that
I'm relatively new to Mailman but I've managed
to build it from source and set up a few lists,
with generous help from this list.
While working through issues relating to
creating a standard list configuration, I started
to feel that there was a fundamental flaw in the
way Mailman lists are config
Let me say that i don't manage or host any lists. I am,
however, a member of several lists. As a member of mailing
lists i have a suggestion for a feature that would, i think,
be of benefit to list members an non-members.
As a member of several developer/support lists I often see
postings from
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:08:16 -0500
Ron Kayron Karen Colson wrote:
> I would like to add to the wish list the ability to set (or designate)
> some subscribers for receiving only, withholding from them the ability
> to post to the list.
This is a current feature of 2.1.
--
J C Lawrence
Ron & Karen Colson wrote:
> I would like to add to the wish list the ability to set (or designate)
> some subscribers for receiving only, withholding from them the ability
> to post to the list.
>
> Ron & Karen Colson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
How big are your lists? You can do this now in a
I would like to
add to the wish list the ability to set (or designate) some subscribers for
receiving only, withholding from them the ability to post to the
list.
Ron & Karen
Colson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:08:07PM -0800, alex wetmore wrote:
> The current code turns on the "disable mail delivery" flag for the
> user or unsubscribes them.
>
> I'd prefer to see two disable mail delivery flags, one that is
> set/unset by the user (for people who just want to read via the
> ar
The current code turns on the "disable mail delivery" flag for the
user or unsubscribes them.
I'd prefer to see two disable mail delivery flags, one that is
set/unset by the user (for people who just want to read via the
archives) and one that is set by the bounce logic, and unset by the
user.
I
> I am writing to make a suggestion for your software. Actually it's not a
> suggestion, it's a request. Would it be possible to have Mailman remove
> attachments and strip away all HTML and RTF formatting from
> messages before
> they are posted?
That would be wonderful. I see groups a
I am writing to make a suggestion for your software. Actually it's not a
suggestion, it's a request. Would it be possible to have Mailman remove
attachments and strip away all HTML and RTF formatting from messages before
they are posted?
If this feature already exists please tell me how and whe
> "NM" == Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NM> One way of helping this situation out, although it then
NM> generates a race condition (between the original poster and
NM> the moderator), is that the notification to the original
NM> sender could contain a URL and
I fairly often get the situation where list postings are sent from the
wrong account (ie not the subscribed account) and so get held for
moderation with a message sent back to the original user. The user
often fires off another copy (or 2) from the correct email address.
Meanwhile I can get to r
29 matches
Mail list logo
