Larry:
Thank you. What was not clear to me was who discarded the message. You're
saying it
was my own provider. That explains a lot. I thought it was the recipient.
If my provider is blocking the last few names on my low-volume list, I've got a
serious
problem. Thanks again for explaining
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Robert Boyd Skipper wrote:
> Ok. Here is another problem.
>
> Today, I found that the subscriptions of twenty or so members have been
> disabled for
> excessive bounces. The message accompanying each disabled subscription is:
>
> ":fail: Domain skipperweb.org has exceeded t
Ok. Here is another problem.
Today, I found that the subscriptions of twenty or so members have been
disabled for
excessive bounces. The message accompanying each disabled subscription is:
":fail: Domain skipperweb.org has exceeded the max emails per hour. Message
discarded.
Now, this is od
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, at 12:27 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> In MM2.1, you'll be able to search a list's membership by regular
> expression. Not as cool as being able to search /all/ lists by regexp
> like you can via the cli, but still useful.
and don't forget, you can do this trivially
> "MR" == Mark Roedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MR> but it's simply not a productive use of an admin's time
MR> (especially when we're talking about larger lists) to go
MR> combing through the web membership management screens for
MR> every subscribed address within a domai
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:37:09 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when I get one of these -- I do it. If a user complains when they
> get the unsub note -- I simply refer them to their admin, since he
> told me to.
I have a short almost canned paragraph I roll out:
Due to sec
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, at 09:59 AM, Mark Roedel wrote:
> When I get a request that provides me with specific addresses to remove,
> I'll do my best to comply.
When mailman actually puts the subscribed address somewhere in the
message where the admin can find it -- then you can blame the
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuq Von Rospach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:37 AM
> To: JT
> Cc: Chuq Von Rospach; Enriko Groen; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Subscriptions
>
>
> when I get on
when I get one of these -- I do it.
If a user complains when they get the unsub note -- I simply refer them
to their admin, since he told me to.
It's his domain. I see no reason to second-guess him, or waste time
arguing with him. If he's an idiot, better off he's idioting elsewhere.
On Wedn
Don't worry, I put the odds at 50/50 that this poor sap will unblock
the address (whichever one it actually is) once his end users complain
about not getting their mailing lists ;-)
Equally likely situations: he has *multiple* users too dumb to figure
out how to unsubscribe (sad), or else he has
> From: Mike Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Could you remove all traces of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your
> system or i will be forced to block your address. This means you will
> receive an administrative mail each time you try to send us a mail
>
> Mike Smith
> IT Department
> MBA Intell
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 09:38:26AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Also, I may I suggest a small change to the company/domain name? Prefix it
> with "Un".
Ok, it struck you that way too, huh? :) I'm frightened that this came
from a technical consulting/recruitment company's IT department.
--
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Mark Roedel wrote:
> > Some of our users are receiving up[ward of 70 mails a day
> > from your selves. Could you remove all traces of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your system or i
> > will be forced to block your address. This means you will
> > receive an administrative mail
> "MS" == Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> Some of our users are receiving up[ward of 70 mails a day from
MS> your selves. Could you remove all traces of
MS> [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your system or i will
MS> be forced to block your address. This means you will recei
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 3:59 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [Mailman-Users] Subscriptions
>
>
> Some of our users are receiving up[ward of 70 mails a day
> from your
Some of our users are receiving up[ward of 70 mails a day from your selves.
Could you remove all traces of [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your
system or i will be forced to block your address. This means you will
receive an administrative mail each time you try to send us a mail
Mike Smith
IT Department
16 matches
Mail list logo
