bruce clark writes:
> My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with
> their sig files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have
> started creating sig files with their commercial messages inside them.
First, consider whether this is really so bad. I know I would
That was kinda my take on it, too.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: mailman-users-bounces+mcnutt=utk@python.org
[mailto:mailman-users-bounces+mcnutt=utk@python.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Sapiro
If I were you, I would moderate the offending users and simply reject their
posts until th
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Paul Tomblin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, bruce clark wrote:
> > My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with their sig
> > files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have started creating sig
> > files with their commercial messages in
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:24 AM, bruce clark wrote:
> My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with their sig
> files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have started creating sig
> files with their commercial messages inside them.
>
You're not going to solve a social p
bruce clark wrote
>
>My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with
>their sig files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have
>started creating sig files with their commercial messages inside them.
>
>This is creating a lot of 'heat' and wasting a huge amount of my tim
Hi,
I've looked at the FAQ but because I put the 'new' in newbie, I don't
really understand the subtleties.
My problem: the users on my lists are waging a low-level war with
their sig files. I do not allow commercial posting so they have
started creating sig files with their commercial me
Thijs Braem wrote:
"For example, there is a project contributor who has implemented a MIME
attachment scanner module which can be dropped into the pipeline. This
module can strip attachments from the message, post the attachments to
an external archive (either the file system or a WebDAV server)
Thijs Braem wrote:
>
>On http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3844 (May 1st, 2000) I read the
>following:
>
>"For example, there is a project contributor who has implemented a MIME
>attachment scanner module which can be dropped into the pipeline. This
>module can strip attachments from the message,
Hello everybody,
On http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3844 (May 1st, 2000) I read the
following:
"For example, there is a project contributor who has implemented a MIME
attachment scanner module which can be dropped into the pipeline. This
module can strip attachments from the message, post the
On 5/17/07, Rodti MacLeary wrote:
> Is there any way for members of a discussion list to ask Mailman to
> 'ignore' the rest of their post, similar to the 'end' command when sending
> an email to the listname-request address? For example a member may have a
> large footer signature automatical
On 5/17/07, Rodti MacLeary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way for members of a discussion list to ask Mailman to
> 'ignore' the rest of their post, similar to the 'end' command when sending
> an email to the listname-request address? For example a member may have a
> large footer signat
Is there any way for members of a discussion list to ask Mailman to
'ignore' the rest of their post, similar to the 'end' command when sending
an email to the listname-request address? For example a member may have a
large footer signature automatically appended to their message when it
leaves the
Just to close this out, turning OFF content-filtering (we catch the bad
extensions in the MTA),
Fixed the issue. Moral of the story: be careful of BLANK content-type
entries
And enabling content-filtering.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>On Jul 29 2005, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>> >We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
>> >Extensions in the list
>> >Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
>> >
>> >Why would mailman strip the .
On Jul 29 2005, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> >We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
> >Extensions in the list
> >Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
> >
> >Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
>
> Content filtering doe
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
>Extensions in the list
>Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
>
>Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
Content filtering does not strip based on filename extension. It strips
base
At 3:12 AM -0400 2005-07-29, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
> Extensions in the list
> Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
>
> Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
Depends on your content filteri
We have a list set up with a 4000K size limit, and just the bad Microsoft
Extensions in the list
Of bad ones, not including the .DOC extension this user used.
Why would mailman strip the .DOC?
2.1.6 on FreeBSD from Ports.
Ideas? Help?
Here's the exim log of the input/output (with e-mail addres
Hi,
What is your version of mailman? In mailman-2.1.6, there is a parameter
to achieve this in the nondigest section of admin interface as
`scrub_nondigest'. Set this `Yes'.
Cheers,
Michael Masse wrote:
> Is there any sort of filter that can have mailman strip attachments, make
> them avail
Is there any sort of filter that can have mailman strip attachments, make them
available for http download, and put a little blurb in the email stating the
URL? I'm trying to prevent the same document from being stored in 5000
mailboxes as well as being virus and spam checked 5000 times everyti
On Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:51 AM, Tim Faircloth wrote:
> moderators), so I do not want the users to see these headers. Is
> there a way to strip these headers out, or configure mailman to
> leave out these headers?
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.001.htp
"While
Hello
I am using Mailman version 2.1.4 on a Solaris 5.8 box using sendmail. I'm
using it to host interoffice lists to which users should not be given the
chance to subscribe/unsubscribe. That's all well and good, but when
someone posts to the list, mailman puts in a few unwanted headers:
Lis
Is there any way to automatically delete all the incoming received lines
from incoming messages ?
I've got a slew of moderators that are convinced that their
email addresses are being harvested because of the presence in the
received lines.
thanks.
Mike
Thanks, Brad. I guess I'll have to upgrade to 2.1 to get that feature.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:04 AM
To: Atkins, Brian
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Stripping attachmen
At 8:23 AM -0400 2003/08/26, Atkins, Brian wrote:
Oops... forgot to ask with my last post: Is there a way to strip out all
attachments?
See the archives. This is actually a more difficult problem than
you imagine, for a variety of technical reasons.
The short answer is that if you go into "
Oops... forgot to ask with my last post: Is there a way to strip out all
attachments?
Brian
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:26, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 8:31 AM -0400 2003/07/08, Jon Carnes wrote:
>
> > Use procmail as a preprocessor and the formail utility to strip out the
> > headers and replace them with more generic ones.
>
> That only works for the headers on input. This is a cas
At 8:31 AM -0400 2003/07/08, Jon Carnes wrote:
Use procmail as a preprocessor and the formail utility to strip out the
headers and replace them with more generic ones.
That only works for the headers on input. This is a case of
headers being generated on output, and being placed there by the
At 12:20 PM -0600 2003/07/07, Devin wrote:
It appears when you look at the header it still shows "(envelope-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), Is there a way so it doesn't show the envelope-from
in the header?)
Nope. This information is put on the "Received:" headers by the
receiving MTA.
Because th
Use procmail as a preprocessor and the formail utility to strip out the
headers and replace them with more generic ones.
You could also write your own milter (something well worth doing - even
if just once)... milter = mail + filter
Jon Carnes
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 14:20, Devin wrote:
> Myself a
Myself and the other administrator that I've set up for this list have
decided to make it members only, and have those members posts be
anonymous. While I've found in the settings where to make the mail look
like it's just coming from the list admin rather then "on behalf of..."
the header still l
I would suspect that your problem lays elsewhere. You might want to
capture the messages as they flying about in their queues and try to
isolate the process that is munging the messages.
Could it be a problem with differing character sets?
In any case, I haven't seen this reported as a problem fo
Hello,
I have Mailman 2.1.1 running with sendmail an freebsd 4.7
I have recently ran into a problem with Mailman stripping all text codes
and making the post nothing but jumbled text without sentences. I do
not have Mailman converting HTML to Plain Text. Although I have tried
that as well
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:49:44AM +, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 15:27, David Gibbs wrote:
> > My personal recommendation ... upgrade to mailman 2.0.6 (at minimum,
> > probably best to go to 2.0.7) and apply Geoff Dairiki's demime patch.
> >
> >
>http://sourceforge.ne
On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 15:27, David Gibbs wrote:
> My personal recommendation ... upgrade to mailman 2.0.6 (at minimum,
> probably best to go to 2.0.7) and apply Geoff Dairiki's demime patch.
>
>
>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=413752&group_id=103&atid=300103
Any of th
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 19:35, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Does anyone know of some type of module, or frontend for MM that
> functions similar to what the Listar (http://www.listar.org) program
> does with attachments? Listar will strip any MIME content off of the
> message and dump it t
Does anyone know of some type of module, or frontend for MM that
functions similar to what the Listar (http://www.listar.org) program
does with attachments? Listar will strip any MIME content off of the
message and dump it to an URL accessible address and will then forward
the message on thr
I looked through the config file. I hope I didn't miss it.
1) Is there a way to either a) bounce messages with attachments, or b)
strip attachments?
2) Look at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-developers/ and you
will see what I mean. Is there a way to use the date received instead of
t
November 22, 2001 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] stripping out HTML
> At 09:06 AM 11/22/2001, you wrote:
> >yes, I know this is a frequently asked question and I know it's mostly
> >sendmail related.
>
> Not really sendmail related (IMHO).
>
> >I want to s
At 09:06 AM 11/22/2001, you wrote:
>yes, I know this is a frequently asked question and I know it's mostly
>sendmail related.
Not really sendmail related (IMHO).
>I want to strip out HTML/attachments from incoming mail messages. I've
>done some research and settled on using stripmime.pl until
yes, I know this is a frequently asked question and I know it's mostly
sendmail related.
I want to strip out HTML/attachments from incoming mail messages. I've
done some research and settled on using stripmime.pl until stripping out
mime stripping is incorporated into Mailman. Unfortunately,
I mentioned this once before and the general response I got was "it
uses them for loop detection, so it leaves them alone", but for
anonymous lists (especially ones dealing with sensitive subjects)
those received headers can easily give away the identity of the
person sending the message, whic
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Steve Hasz wrote:
> 1. Is it possible to strip attachments from messages or not allow them?
My filter at http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html does this. At
the bottom of the webpage are links to some other similar scripts.
> 2. Barring that, I see I can limit the siz
Hope that helps.
0- Jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Hasz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:22 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Stripping Attachments, HTML, Message sizes
including attachments
I run the Roatan Discussion List at:
http://list.linuxlabworks.com/mailman/listinfo/roatan
In the admin tool and documentation, I have been unable to find answers to
the following questions.
1. Is it possible to strip attachments from messages or not allow them?
2. Barring that, I see I can l
45 matches
Mail list logo
