Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Dan Szkola wrote:
>>You can see it actually unlink the compiled version and then look
>>for, find, and seemingly reject the traceback.py and traceback.pyc
>>that it finds. I thought it may be a too many open files problem
>>or a file descriptor limit problem because the FD retu
Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>Very odd, I agree. A truss of the persistent queue runner that handled
>one of the test mails shows this (12762 is the pid that mailman gets
>when sendmail exec's it):
>
> 12762: open64("/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging/Utils.so",
>O_RDONLY) Err#2 ENOENT
> 12762: open64(
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>
>>OK, I found something extremely odd. For some reason,
>>the Utils.pyc in /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging
>>direcotry is being removed and then the compile of it
>>seems to fail and I'm left with a 0 byte file. It is
>>owned by the daemon user and la
Dan Szkola wrote:
>OK, I found something extremely odd. For some reason,
>the Utils.pyc in /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging
>direcotry is being removed and then the compile of it
>seems to fail and I'm left with a 0 byte file. It is
>owned by the daemon user and later it gets compiled
>and is ow
OK, I found something extremely odd. For some reason,
the Utils.pyc in /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Logging
direcotry is being removed and then the compile of it
seems to fail and I'm left with a 0 byte file. It is
owned by the daemon user and later it gets compiled
and is owned by the mailman user.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>
>>The python 2.4.1 was compiled from source and is the only python version
>>on the box.
>>
>>
>
>In a later post, you say it wasn't, but you removed the Sun Gnome
>Python 2.3. I hope that fixes it, but I doubt it will.
>
>
It did not. It was doub
Dan Szkola wrote:
>John W. Baxter wrote:
>
>>On 10/19/05 11:14 AM, "Dan Szkola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Dan Szkola wrote:
>Patched the admin script as suggested. When I saw the error this
>morning, I em
John W. Baxter wrote:
>Do you have multiple Python versions installed?
>
>
Sigh. Apparently, Sun installs python 2.3 as part of the Gnome install.
I removed it and now I'm getting different errors.
I will restart everything and see if that does not clear up this issue.
The Sun gnome was in /us
John W. Baxter wrote:
>On 10/19/05 11:14 AM, "Dan Szkola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Dan Szkola wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Patched the admin script as suggested. When I saw the error this
morning, I emailed
to the admin address of our
On 10/19/05 11:14 AM, "Dan Szkola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Dan Szkola wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Patched the admin script as suggested. When I saw the error this
>>> morning, I emailed
>>> to the admin address of our test list. Here is what I got:
>>>
>>> - Transcr
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>
>
>>Patched the admin script as suggested. When I saw the error this
>>morning, I emailed
>>to the admin address of our test list. Here is what I got:
>>
>> - Transcript of session follows -
>>PYTHONPATH /usr/local/mailman
>>
>>
>
>I wouldn
Dan Szkola wrote:
>Patched the admin script as suggested. When I saw the error this
>morning, I emailed
>to the admin address of our test list. Here is what I got:
>
> - Transcript of session follows -
>PYTHONPATH /usr/local/mailman
I wouldn't have expected this, but I don't think it s
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Dan Szkola wrote (in separate posts):
>
>
>You could try the following patch to the $prefix/scripts/post script to
>print the environment each time it is invoked. Assuming sendmail
>doesn't choke on this in the normal case, it should appear in the DSN
>in the error case.
>
Dan Szkola wrote (in separate posts):
>
>Is there somewhere I can enable more debugging to help get to the bottom of
>this issue? I'm finding next to nothing in the logs that is helpful.
As Brad replied, there are no debugging switches, but I'm not sure that
this would be helpful in this case any
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>
>>I am running a Solaris 10 box, with mailman-2.1.6rc4 and sendmail
>>version 8.13.3. Python version is 2.4.1.
>>
>>I run sendmail in the following ways:
>>
>>
>>A normal sendmail daemon listening on port 25:
>>
>>/usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q15m
>>
>>A persi
At 8:37 AM -0500 2005-10-18, Dan Szkola wrote:
> Is there somewhere I can enable more debugging to help get to the bottom of
> this issue? I'm finding next to nothing in the logs that is helpful.
There is no additional debugging that can be enabled. Assuming
you're looking in the righ
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>
>>I am running a Solaris 10 box, with mailman-2.1.6rc4 and sendmail
>>version 8.13.3. Python version is 2.4.1.
>>
>>I run sendmail in the following ways:
>>
>>
>>A normal sendmail daemon listening on port 25:
>>
>>/usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q15m
>>
>>A persi
Dan Szkola wrote:
>
>I am running a Solaris 10 box, with mailman-2.1.6rc4 and sendmail
>version 8.13.3. Python version is 2.4.1.
>
>I run sendmail in the following ways:
>
>
>A normal sendmail daemon listening on port 25:
>
>/usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q15m
>
>A persistent queue runner:
>
>/usr/lib/send
Hello all,
We are converting our lists from a different list server to mailman.
I am running a Solaris 10 box, with mailman-2.1.6rc4 and sendmail
version 8.13.3. Python version is 2.4.1.
I run sendmail in the following ways:
A normal sendmail daemon listening on port 25:
/usr/lib/sendmail -bd
19 matches
Mail list logo
