On 11/30/2004 2:26, "Douglas McCarroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It really surprises me that the vast majority of lists (including this one!)
> blithely send out posters' email addresses to all subscribers. Of course,
> having
> an anonymous list means that posters have to sign their emails,
Douglas McCarroll wrote:
>I'm a relative Mailman newby, but this is a big interest of mine. I've just
>set
>up a couple of lists, and here's what I've done to prevent the harvesting of
>list-user email addresses by spammers. Some may be excessive - I don't fully
>understand all the options - b
I'm a relative Mailman newby, but this is a big interest of mine. I've just set
up a couple of lists, and here's what I've done to prevent the harvesting of
list-user email addresses by spammers. Some may be excessive - I don't fully
understand all the options - but when in doubt I take the caut
At 5:47 PM + 2004-11-29, Gary Smith wrote:
In one of the previous posts (Allow members to send e-mail to another list)
it was mentioned that intelligent spammers could monitor the output of a
list and then spoof one of the subscribed addresses.
Indeed, this is a risk.
I dont know much a
> "Gary" == Gary Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> In one of the previous posts (Allow members to send e-mail
Gary> to another list) it was mentioned that intelligent spammers
Gary> could monitor the output of a list and then spoof one of the
Gary> subscribed addresses.
Hi.
In one of the previous posts (Allow members to send e-mail to another list) it
was mentioned that intelligent spammers could monitor the output of a list and
then spoof one of the subscribed addresses.
I dont know much about emails, but how is this possible that they can monitor
the out
