Re: [Mailman-Users] Stability of Mailman 2.1.10

2007-12-20 Thread Brad Knowles
On 12/20/07, Mark Sapiro wrote: > I think it is quite solid. I am running my production lists on it, but > most of the translations are not up to date, and there will be changes > (I've already made 2) and probably one more release before the final. I'm going to be installing it soon for pytho

Re: [Mailman-Users] Stability of Mailman 2.1.10

2007-12-20 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Cyndi Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I asked my ISP to upgrade to the new version of MM (they're using 2.1.9). > I'm especially excited about the admin_member_chunksize feature. Their > reply: "From their site it appears this is not a stable release...I expect > we will not be upgrading until it

Re: [Mailman-Users] Stability of Mailman 2.1.10

2007-12-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
Cyndi Norwitz wrote: >I asked my ISP to upgrade to the new version of MM (they're using 2.1.9). >I'm especially excited about the admin_member_chunksize feature. Their >reply: "From their site it appears this is not a stable release...I expect >we will not be upgrading until it is indicated it is

[Mailman-Users] Stability of Mailman 2.1.10

2007-12-20 Thread Cyndi Norwitz
I asked my ISP to upgrade to the new version of MM (they're using 2.1.9). I'm especially excited about the admin_member_chunksize feature. Their reply: "From their site it appears this is not a stable release...I expect we will not be upgrading until it is indicated it is the latest stable release