RE: [Mailman-Users] Simple question about archive times...

2002-03-13 Thread Dirk H. Schulz
ent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:37 PM >To: Richard Idalski >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Simple question about archive times... > > >Hi Richard, > >At 11:04 13.03.2002 -0500, you wrote: > > >I think I just need a little bit of enlightenment here. When viewing the > &

RE: [Mailman-Users] Simple question about archive times...

2002-03-13 Thread Richard Idalski
onuke --- -Original Message- From: Dirk H. Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:37 PM To: Richard Idalski Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Simple question about archive times... Hi Richard, At 11:04 13.03.2002 -0500, you wrote: >I think I just need a little bit of enlig

[Mailman-Users] Simple question about archive times...

2002-03-13 Thread Richard Idalski
I think I just need a little bit of enlightenment here. When viewing the archives for some of my lists I'll see the times as UT ( Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:04:58 UT ), an other times like this : ( Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:03:05 -0500 ). I'm not seeing any consistency as to why it sometimes assigns the UT, an

[Mailman-Users] Simple question about archive times...

2002-03-12 Thread Richard Idalski
I think I just need a little bit of enlightenment here. When viewing the archives for some of my lists I'll see the times as UT ( Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:04:58 UT ), an other times like this : ( Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:03:05 -0500 ). I'm not seeing any consistency as to why it sometimes assigns the UT, and