Re: [Mailman-Users] Setting up redundant mailing lists in OSXSnowLeopard.

2010-01-07 Thread JRC Groups
Hi, Mark. On 1/4/10 9:38 AM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote: > But you probably don't need to mung the reply-to, at least for the > sublists. Assuming no reply-to munging at all, the original post will > always be From: the OP and To: the umbrella. Thus reply will go to the > OP and reply-all to the OP and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Setting up redundant mailing lists in OSXSnowLeopard.

2010-01-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
JRC Groups wrote: > >On 1/1/10 8:46 AM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote: > >> JRC Groups wrote: [...] >> >> I think an umbrella list is appropriate for your requirement. Most of >> the issues with umbrella lists have to do with people who are members >> of more than one subordinate list receiving multiple co

Re: [Mailman-Users] Setting up redundant mailing lists in OSXSnowLeopard.

2010-01-04 Thread Mark Sapiro
Geoff Shang wrote: >On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, JRC Groups wrote: > >> This is indeed the case. All subscribers will either belong to one list or >> the other. Never both. One of the issues I noticed when reading the post has >> to do with replies from subscribers. Considering subscribers are either >> re