On 11/18/05 6:58 AM, "Greg Earle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The old machine is running Majordomo and Sendmail, not Mailman and
> Postfix. Sorry if that wasn't clearer. So it's not a matter of
> just bringing lists/archives/etc. across, alas.
It was very clear in your original post, but that
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 06:58 -0800, Greg Earle wrote:
> Turning off the old machine and creating the lists on the new,
> renamed-to-be-the-old machine would then mean that the new
> lists would have to work straight out of the box, with no
> downtime. Given my unfamiliarity with the software, this
On Nov 18, 2005, at 9:02 PM, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm pretty new to Mailman and Postfix (I'm more familiar with
>> Sendmail and Courier on Solaris) so I'm not really sure how to
>> address this - I suppose one answer is to simply turn the old
>> box off and rename the new one
Greg Earle wrote:
>
>When the introductory e-mail went out, one (important) user quickly
>pointed out that he didn't like the idea of the new machine's name
>being used - he'd rather use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" than "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
>I have to say, I agree with him. It seems like Mailman is very
>
I'm trying to convert an existing Solaris list server (using MajorDomo)
over to a Linux-based (RHEL 3) Mailman setup. The old machine is called
"rushmore" and the new Linux machine is called "rushmorex". The idea is
to replace "rushmore" with "rushmorex" (and change the name to be
"rushmore") onc
