On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 12:44 , Richard Barrett wrote:
> Surely, if you are using the built-in pipermail archiver, you can also
> set a list's archive to private on the Archive Options web GUI admin
> page. The list archives are then not available through the /pipermail/
> URI path elem
At 23:55 15/04/2002 +0900, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
>On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 11:30 , Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>>While I am an enthusiastic user of mailman,
>>doesn't majordomo still have a well-defined usage,
>>for essentially private lists like committee minutes?
>>
>>This is a genuine question
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 11:30 , Timothy Murphy wrote:
> While I am an enthusiastic user of mailman,
> doesn't majordomo still have a well-defined usage,
> for essentially private lists like committee minutes?
>
> This is a genuine question --
> am I right in assuming that mailman lists are
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Ernesto Gluecksmann wrote:
> New convert from Majordomo.
> It wasn't hard to switch once I got around to checking out Mailman's poweress.
> It's like coming out of the dark ages into the age of enlightment.
> Well, maybe not so dramatic, but defini
Hi all.
New convert from Majordomo. It wasn't hard to
switch once I got around to checking out Mailman's poweress. It's like
coming out of the dark ages into the age of enlightment. Well, maybe not
so dramatic, but definite difference.
My question relates to Server Side Includes.
M
