At 10:38 AM -0500 10/17/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> I am new to this list having just implemented mailman for an
>> announce-list we host. In short, the performance is horrible. The list
>> has approx 40,000 subscribers and the avg message going out is about 40K
>> (some embedded imagery). I k
* Lindsay Haisley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would try to profile the problem, chunk it down into components and see
> where
> it's taking the most time. My guess is that it's not a Mailman problem, but
> an
> MTA problem. "Unresponsive" generally means that your load average has gone
> way
Thus spake Gadi Evron on Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:38:48AM CDT
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Peter Kofod wrote:
> > Hi Everyone:
> >
> > I am new to this list having just implemented mailman for an
> > announce-list we host. In short, the performance is horrible. The list
> > has approx 40,000 subscriber
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Peter Kofod wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> I am new to this list having just implemented mailman for an
> announce-list we host. In short, the performance is horrible. The list
> has approx 40,000 subscribers and the avg message going out is about 40K
> (some embedded imagery).
On 10/17/06, Peter Kofod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has gotten to the point where we can't even manage the system via the
> web interface (keep getting a 500 Internal Server error). I am
> obviously no mailman or postfix guru, so any pointers on where I should
> look in the logs and make chan
Hi Everyone:
I am new to this list having just implemented mailman for an
announce-list we host. In short, the performance is horrible. The list
has approx 40,000 subscribers and the avg message going out is about 40K
(some embedded imagery). I know we can do better with lazy html etc.,
but the
